A handy FAQ for service animals in the workplace

A local Subway recently earned itself some bad publicity when an employee denied access to a customer with a service dog.

While this story involved a customer, and not an employee, it did get me thinking about employee service dogs at work.

I created this handy FAQ on service dogs at work for your reference.

The 13th nominee for the “worst employer of 2019” is … the excoriating executives

It’s been nearly a month since I posted the last nominee for 2019’s Worst Employer. It’s not for lack of ideas; it’s just that the prior nominees have been so awful that the bar for qualification has been set pretty high. Thankfully, France Télécom has come to the rescue.

What did the former top executives at France’s national phone company do to earn their nomination?

35 Employees Committed Suicide. Will Their Bosses Go to Jail?

WIRTW #559 (the “Happy Birthday D-Man” edition)

This guy turns 11 on Sunday.

Happy birthday Donovan! Please keep making us smile.

Here’s what I read the past two weeks.

Discrimination

• No lockable private room for breast-feeding at workplace: $3.8 million award — via Overlawyered
• #MeToo: Looking to best teaching practices for effective training — via Employer Law Report
• What form of discrimination do juries hate most? (But, you’re probably doing the least to address.) — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog
• “Sexual harassment” in the nature of the business — via Robin Shea’s Employment & Labor Insider
• 11th Cir.: Hospital employee fired for performance, not reporting racial slur — via HR Dive
• Federal Court Declares That a Ban on Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims Is Inconsistent with Federal Law — via Financial Services Employment Law
• USWNT – Enough Already, This IS RIDICULOUS! — via Compensation Cafe
• Applicants are not required to disclose a pregnancy before or after being offered a job — via Richmond Times-Dispatch

HR & Employee Relations

• Your Job Candidates and New Hires are Ghosting You. This is What You’ve Earned and 9 True Tales of Ghosting at Work — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas
• Yikes!!! Sometimes HR Pros and Managers Can Be Personally Liable for Violations!!! — via The EmpLAWyerologist, Janette Levey Frisch
• Office pranks shouldn’t end with the ER, vomit, or tears — via Ask a Manager
• Would You Fire Starbucks Employees Who Ask People to Leave for Questionable Reasons? — via The HR Capitalist
• Everybody Deserves PTO — via Laurie Ruettimann

Technology

• Border Patrol union president: Fire agents responsible for offensive Facebook posts — via CUE, Inc.
• Security Considerations in a BYOD Culture — via Dark Reading
• NIST Issues Report on Internet of Things Cybersecurity — via Ride The Lightning
• Cybersecurity For Businesses Part 1-How Cybersecurity Has Evolved — via Accellis
• Understanding Millennials’ And Technology’s Role In The Workforce, Part One — via Forbes
• More Companies Expanding Employee Monitoring — via EntertainHR
• Your Blockchain in HR Guide In Just 5 Minutes — via Workology

Wage & Hour

• To The Victors Go Few, If Any, Spoils In Wage And Hour Suits — via Law 360
• Can You Switch a Full-Time Worker Into a Contractor? — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas
• Which Are They? Independent Contractors Or Employees? Navigating The Conflicts Between State And Federal Law — via Labor Employment Law Blog
• The cost of a $15 federal minimum wage — via Workplace Fairness
• Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … Time-Rounding Continue Reading — via Wage & Hour Defense Blog
• Dear Employers: You Can Go To Jail For Firing Employees Due To A Garnishment — via Donna Ballman’s Screw You Guys, I’m Going Home
• This One’s a Whopper! Court Puts Kibosh on Burger King Franchisee That Required Two Calls to Request FMLA Leave — via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights

Labor

• NLRB speak on Employee Handbook Provisions (again). Private Sector Employers Take Note. — via BeLabor The Point
• The Gig Economy — via Labor Relations Institute
• NLRB Strengthens Employer Property Rights: What UPMC Means for Employers — via Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives™
• NLRB Limits Duty to Bargain Over Disciplinary Actions — via Labor Employment Law Blog

OSHA & Safety

• Do I Have to Buy a Standing Desk for My Employee? — via upstartHR
• Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Workers’ Compensation Claimant Solicitation Law — via The Employment Brief
• Ohio Senate Removes Damaging Changes to Workers’ Compensation Budget — via Ohio Chamber Blog
• Nonprofit Workplaces — via Harvard Business Review
• What Else is at Issue in the BWC Budget Bill? — via Employers Workers’ Compensation Law Blog

Rob Mendez won the Jimmy V Award at last night’s ESPYS, and it might be the most inspiring thing you’ve ever seen

Rob Mendez coaches the JV football team at Prospect High School in Saratoga, California. He’s also lived his entire life with no arms and no legs. He was born with tetra-amelia syndrome, an extremely rare genetic disorder that prevented their embryonic formation. You can read Rob’s entire (and entirely) compelling story at this ESPN feature story, or watch it in this Jon Hamm-narrated featurette.

Last night, at ESPN’s annual sports awards, the network honored Rob Mendez with its Jimmy V Award for Perseverance.

As compelling and inspiring as he and his story are, so was his acceptance speech last night.

Why are employers testing job applicants for prescription medications?

During a pre-employment medical examination and drug screen, an applicant tests positive for Alprazolam, the generic form of Xanax (a medication commonly prescribed for anxiety), a fact she had already disclosed during the examination. The doctor performing the medical exam and reviewing the drug screen concludes that the applicant is medically acceptable for work as an intake specialist at an inpatient mental health facility. The employer, however, has other ideas. It withdraws the job offer without providing the applicant any opportunity to discuss the results.

The applicant sues, claiming disability discrimination.

Who wins?

NLRB offers significant and important guidance on its new(ish) employee handbook rules

It’s been just over 18 months since the NLRB decided Boeing Co., perhaps its most significant decision in decades. It rewrote more than a decade of precedent by overturning its Lutheran Heritage standard regarding when facially neutral employment policies violate the rights of employees to engage in concerted activity protected by section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.

In Boeing, the Board scrapped Lutheran Heritage’s “reasonably construe” test (a work rule violates section 7 if an employee could “reasonably construe” an infringement of their section 7 rights) with a test that balances “asserted business justifications and the invasion of employee rights” by weighing “(i) the nature and extent of the potential impact on NLRA rights, and (ii) legitimate justifications associated with the requirement(s).” It was a huge win for employers drafting and issuing workplace policies.

Why, yesterday, in France was a stadium full of people chanting “EQUAL PAY?”

Indisputable fact no. 1: Women and men should earn the same pay for the same work.

Indisputable fact no. 2: The players on the United States women’s national soccer team earn substantially less than their counterparts on the men’s team.

The Equal Pay Act requires that an employer pay its male and female employees equal pay for equal work. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal. Substantial equality is measured by job content, not job titles.