Showing posts with label wage and hour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wage and hour. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

Tread carefully if stripping employees of their pay


Wait, not this kind of stripping?
Stevens v. Oval Office (E.D. Wisc. 12/29/16) [hat tip: Walter Olson’s Overlawyered] poses an interesting question—is it ever permissible to dock an employee’s pay for disciplinary reasons? The fact that the plaintiffs are adult dancers docked for rule infractions such as “failing to fully remove all clothing, except for underwear, by the end of the first song when dancing on stage” doesn’t dissuade interest either.

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

12 myths about independent contractor misclassification


Earlier this week, the Department of Labor published a new web guide on the issue of independent contractor misclassifications. The DOL’s tagline, “Misclassification Affects Everyone”, along with the comprehensive content contained therein, makes it clear that this issue remains hot for the agency
Contained the guide is a document entitled, “Myths About Misclassification”, listing 12 myths the DOL believes businesses commonly hold about independent contractors.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Santa Claus and child labor laws


While I was watching Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer with my family something struck me. The elves working in Santa’s Workshop manufacturing the toys looked awfully young. Is it possible that the North Pole lacks child labor laws? Is this how Santa keeps his costs down? After all, he needs toys for more than half a billion children.

So, what are Ohio’s child labor laws?


Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Ohio set to maintain stable statewide minimum wage


A bill is on its way to Governor Kasich’s desk for signature that would prohibit any municipality or other political subdivision from establishing a minimum wage different from Ohio’s state minimum wage.

Sub. S.B. 331 [pdf] is a reaction to efforts of the “Fight for 15” movement to create piecemeal minimum wage increases city by city. Recall that earlier this year, Ohio’s attorney general issued an advisory opinion that a municipal ordinance may not require an employer to by a to pay its employees an hourly minimum wage rate that is in excess of the statewide hourly minimum wage rate,which is fixed by Ohio’s Constitution. This bill clears up an ambiguity over this issue.

Monday, December 5, 2016

A $15 minimum wage is not without consequences #fightfor15


Donald Trump’s presidency sparks an interesting dichotomy—a Republican that rode into office on a wave of populism, including fiscal populism. Officially, the President-elect favors a higher minimum wage: “On the minimum wage, Mr. Trump has voiced support for raising it to $10 at the federal level, but believes states should set the minimum wage as appropriate for their state.” 

The “Fight for 15” movement is taking notice:

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

With the new overtime rules DOA, what now for employers?


Yesterday I promised myself a blogging vacation until after the Thanksgiving holiday. And then Judge Amos L. Mazzant III dropped the biggest employment law story of the year by enjoining the DOL’s new overtime rules.

My 5th grade daughter just completed two long-term school projects—a comprehensive book report celebrating a Newbery Medal winner (she chose Shiloh), and a scientific study of a native Ohio bird (she chose the wild turkey). They were due within two days of each other, and she had several weeks to complete each. We sat down with her school planner and mapped out reasonable due dates for each piece of each project, so that she would not get slammed at the end. With her busy music schedule, this lesson in non-procrastination was vital to her completing the projects on time (which she did).

I hope she doesn’t read this post, because I don't want her ever to think procrastinators win. Nevertheless, employers who procrastinated in preparing for the new overtime rules are feeling pretty good right about now.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

BREAKING: Federal judge grants nationwide preliminary injunction against FLSA overtime rule


Consider this the judicial equivalent of a Hail Mary, or full-court buzzer beater, or a bottom-of-the-9th, 2-out grand slam.

Judge Amos L. Mazzant III of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has just issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the DOL’s impending December 1 change to the FLSA’s white-collar salary test.

Dropping some wage and hour wisdom on turkey giveaways


One law firm for which I used to work provided each staff member an annual Thanksgiving turkey as a holiday thank you to its employees. With the hindsight of two decades of employment-law experience, here’s my question—should the fair market value of that turkey been included in the employees’ regular rate of pay? Because if it was, the company would have to include its value in the calculation of employees’ overtime rates.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

What happens to the new FLSA salary test under President Trump?


The one employment-law question I’ve been asked most since waking up last Wednesday to the reality that The Donald will be The President (aside from, “How did this happen,” and for that I direct you to John Oliver’s excellent 30-minute soliloquy of an answer from his Sunday night HBO program—warning, language NSFW) is, “Does this mean that the new FLSA salary test won’t go into effect?”

The short answer? “No, it does not mean that.”

Monday, November 7, 2016

We measure salaries for FLSA exemptions weekly, not annually


An article entitled, “Obama overtime-pay rule prompts changes, requires loans, as Ohio universities adapt,” which ran last week on Cleveland.com, caught my eye. The articles discusses how universities are struggling with the impending salary-test change to the FLSA’s various overtime exemptions.

The article links to a communication plan published by the University of Cincinnati [pdf], discussing how the new salary test will impact its salaried employees. This is what the university is telling its employees:

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Don’t forget the fluctuating workweek for your salaried nonexempt employees


Are you still struggling with how to handle your currently exempt employees who, one month from today, will earn less than $913 per week? If you have a salaried employee, no matter what they do on a day-to-day basis, if he or she earn less than $913 per week, beginning December 1 that employee will be non-exempt no matter what.

Let me offer a suggestion you may not yet have considered—the fluctuating workweek.

Monday, October 31, 2016

Feds publish a Halloween trick for employers


Have you seen Worker.gov? It is a how-to manual for employees to file charges with the full gauntlet of federal labor-and-employment agencies―EEOC, NLRB, OSHA, and DOL Wage-and-Hour Division.


Thursday, October 13, 2016

Lawsuit highlights the risk of unpaid training time


Employment Law 360 reports that Hawaiian Airlines has been sued by a group of employees claiming that their mandatory unpaid 10-day customer service training course violated the Fair Labor Standards Act.
According to court papers, trainees learned things like federal regulatory requirements and how to use a standard airline software system. … The suit claimed the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law required trainees be paid at least minimum wage “because, among other things, attendance was mandatory, the course material was related to the trainee’s job, and attendance was during regular working hours.”

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Court rules employers cannot take overtime credit for paid lunches


The Fair Labor Standards Act does not require paid lunches for employees. Indeed, quite to the contrary, the FLSA provides that meal breaks (presumptively defined as breaks of more than 20 minutes during which the employee is totally relieved of his or her work duties) can be unpaid.

What happens, however, to an employee’s overtime compensation if the employer pays an employee for non-working lunches? Is the employer entitled to use the extra compensation for the paid lunches to offset other overtime compensation?

Monday, October 3, 2016

Why the DOL’s federal contractor paid sick leave rules matter for all employers


Last week, the Department of Labor rolled out its final regulations mandating paid sick leave for the employees of federal contractors. According to the DOL, Once fully implemented, more than one million employees of federal contractors will be covered. At the highest of levels, the rule mandates that covered workers earn up to 56 hours (7 work days) of paid sick leave annually. Notably, the rule does not apply retroactively, and only applies to new federal contracts and replacements for expiring contracts on or after January 1, 2017.


Wednesday, September 21, 2016

When is December 1 not December 1? When two lawsuits challenge the new overtime rules.


On December 1, the Department of Labor’s new salary test for exempt employees is set to take effect, raising the salary level to qualify for certain white collar overtime exemptions from $455 per week to $913 per week.

That is, it is set to take effect if the two lawsuits filed yesterday don’t delay or outright stop the rules from taking effect.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

The NLRB is now basically creating unfair labor practices out of thin air


Image via forbes.com
Those that have been readers for awhile know of my dislike of the NLRB’s expansion of its doctrine of protected concerted activity (e.g., here and here).

The latest on the NLRB’s hit list: employee mis-classifications. The NLRB has concluded that an employer has committed an unfair labor practice and violated an employee’s section 7 rights by (mis)classifying its employees as independent contractors. Or so was the Board’s conclusion in its recently published General Counsel Advice Memorandum [pdf].

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

A wage/hour primer for employers with tipped employees


Employment Law 360 is reporting that a waitress is suing Walt Disney World for improperly taking a “tip credit” and paying her less than the minimum wage even though she spent significant time performing non-tipped work.

That story got me thinking that in the nine-plus years of this blog, I’ve never discussed how the FLSA impacts tipped employees. If you employ tipped workers, today is your lucky day.


Wednesday, August 17, 2016

DOL wage/hour agreement with Subway raises legitimate joint-employer concerns


The Department of Labor recently unveiled an agreement with Subway through which the fast-food giant has agreed to assist its franchisees in their wage-and-hour compliance.

the agreement builds upon the division’s ongoing work to provide technical assistance and training to Subway’s franchisees. It also provides an avenue for information-sharing where we will provide data about our concluded investigations with Subway, and they will share their own data with us, generating creative problem solving and sparking new ideas to promote compliance. When circumstances warrant, the franchisor will remind franchisees of the Wage and Hour Division’s authority to investigate their establishments and to examine records. It also specifies that Subway may exercise its business judgment in dealing with a franchisee’s status within the brand, based upon any history of Fair Labor Standards Act violations.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

When the Department of Labor can’t even figure out the FLSA…


According to Employment Law 360, the U.S. Department of Labor has agreed to pay $7 million to settle claims that it failed to pay overtime to thousands of its employees:
“This is the agency that goes around fining all the private employers for doing the same thing that it just ended up paying $7 million to make go away,” said the union’s attorney.…
AFGE’s collective action-type grievance had accused the DOL of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to compensate employees eligible under the statute for suffer or permit overtime. Amid the 10-year legal fight, workers who were classified as FLSA exempt were moved back to FLSA-eligible, the union said.