WIRTW #773: the 'free speech' edition

"Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech; a Thing terrible to Publick Traytors."

— Benjamin Franklin, The New-England Courant, July 9, 1722.

"If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable."
— U.S. Supreme Court, Texas v. Johnson (1989).

"The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed — would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper — the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."
— George Orwell, 1984.

"Free speech is neither a privilege nor a partisan luxury. It's the oxygen of democracy. Without it, elections are hollow, dissent is branded illegitimate, or worse, and truth becomes whatever those in power decree. History shows that silencing speech is both the path by which authoritarians rise and the tool by which they endure."
— Jon Hyman, September 18, 2025.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Documentation + Process + Conduct = the three things you need to best bulletproof your termination decisions

How do you fireproof your workplace decisions from discrimination lawsuits? By doing exactly what Kent State University just did.

A transgender professor sued after being denied a leadership role and campus transfer, claiming sex discrimination. On appeal, the 6th Circuit affirmed the summary dismissal of the case, because the employer had its ducks in a row.

Here's what happened, and why the university won.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Employers need process, not panic, when the internet comes calling.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Yet Vice President JD Vance is urging the outrage mobs on. "When you see someone celebrating Charlie's murder, call them out and call their employer." That was his closing call to action as guest host of Charlie Kirk's podcast yesterday.

Plenty didn't need the nudge. Within 24 hours of Kirk's killing, employers nationwide—from media outlets to universities, airlines to retailers—were disciplining or firing staff over posts deemed "insensitive" or "celebratory" of his death.

A cottage industry of doxxing quickly formed. A site originally branded Expose Charlie's Murderers (since rebranded Charlie Kirk Data Foundation for obvious legal reasons) began cataloging names, employers, and posts. Activists like Laura Loomer pledged to ruin careers.

When does the workday begin and end for a remote worker?

With the rise of remote work, wage and hour laws have forced employers to grapple with what should be a straightforward question: When does a remote employee's workday actually begin and end?

In Lott v. Recker Consulting, the Southern District of Ohio offered a clear answer.

Kiara Lott and 130 of her fellow Patient Care Associates worked from home as call-center reps. Their day started with the familiar remote routine: coffee, logging in, Duo security, VPN, ADP timekeeping, Microsoft Teams, and then opening the phone system and workflow tools to handle patient calls.

They sued under the FLSA, claiming they weren't paid for the minutes spent booting up, logging in, authenticating, and later shutting down. The employer countered that all of that was non-compensable "preliminary" or "postliminary" time.

WIRTW #772: the 'drooly zerberts' edition

On this week's episode of The Norah and Dad Show, I check in with Norah as she kicks off her sophomore year of college. We talk about her experiences pledging a sorority, balancing two jobs, navigating classes, and how the dorm food is holding up.

It's a fun conversation about growth, responsibility, and finding your footing in year two of college life.

Below is a quick clip to whet your appetite.

You can listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

'Come on you Gunners!' as pretext for discrimination?

My family are Gooners. For the uninitiated, that means we're Arsenal Football Club supporters. My 17-year-old son is the most passionate of the lot.

On a recent layover in an airport lounge, Donovan was wearing his Arsenal kit when a man walked by, pointed at the crest, and with a British accent said: "Oy, you got some dirt on your chest."

It took Donovan a minute to process. And then, barely missing a beat, he got up, walked over to the man, and asked, "Are you a Spurs fan?" ("Spurs," short for Tottenham Hotspur, Arsenal's North London neighbor and most despised rival.)

The man replied, "I am."

To which Donovan, at the top of his lungs, yelled: "PISS OFF!"

Then he turned and walked back to our table, leaving the man chuckling with his family.

Can we still trust the EEOC to enforce our anti-discrimination laws?

The EEOC exists to combat workplace discrimination. Employers depend on it for guidance, employees depend on it for protection, and its credibility is what makes civil rights law meaningful in the workplace.

That's why the recent allegations against the agency itself are so concerning.

Marc Seawright, a transgender man and the EEOC's former Director of Information Governance and Strategy, alleges in his recently filed EEOC charge that the agency instructed him to scrub every mention of LGBTQ+ identities from its outreach materials. The agency created these materials to help employers understand their obligations under Title VII as defined by the Supreme Court in the Bostock case. According to Seawright, his expertise is now being "leveraged to perpetuate discrimination against people like me."