Monday, August 2, 2010
I don't like Mondays (tell me why)
There is no worse feeling than coming into your office bright and early on a Monday morning, hitting the power button on your computer, and... nothing. That's what happened to me this morning. 7 am - no computer, no help desk, and nothing I can do about it. So here I am on my smart phone with my Monday morning tip of the day. Don't be so dependent on technology. Otherwise, you'll be stuck at your desk wondering how to kill time until your 9 am deposition starts (with no access to your witness outline because it's on your computer. Technology drives nearly every aspect of our society, including our businesses and our workforces. Think about disaster planning for your business, and how your business would function if it had to do so without technology for even a day. Scary exercise, but maybe one that we should all do so we don't get caught with our servers down one day. As for me, I'm off to dig into my file cabinets and see what I can get done in the next two hours.
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Friday, July 30, 2010
WIRTW #137
Happy 20th Birthday to the ADA. Some notable bloggers share their thoughts on the ADA at 20.
-
ADA’s 20th Anniversary – from Walter Olson
-
ADA’s anniversary, cont’d – from Overlawyered
-
ADA Turns 20, Still Has Growing Up To Do – from Workplace Diva
-
ADA anniversary approaches – from Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog
-
EEOC Celebrates 20th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act – from Wyatt Employment Law Report
Here’s the rest of what I read this week.
Discrimination
-
The Basics: What It Takes To File a Employment Discrimination Lawsuit – from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog
-
Settling Gender Discrimination Class Actions (Part I) – from Workplace Fairness
-
Ninth Circuit Approves of “Preemptive” Fitness for Duty Examination – from World of Work
-
An “Old bully” but not the victim of age discrimination – from John Holmquist’s Michigan Employment Law Connection
-
No Matter How Bad it Looks, Don't Rush to Judgment: Do an Investigation – from Debra Reilly’s Workplace Investigations Blog
-
Minimizing Risk of Retaliation Claims Is As Easy As A B C – from The Proactive Employer
-
Patient’s preference for white aides does not trump health care employer’s duty to its employees to abstain from race-based work assignments – from Employment Law Matters
-
Shifting Reasons Still Help Show Pretext – from Tom Crane’s San Antonio Employment Law Blog
Technology
-
The Right to Photograph Public Places – from Philip Miles’s Lawffice Space
-
Enterprise iPads: Policies on personal iPads and remote access – from The Apple Core
-
Ninth Circuit Provides Some Relief for Employers and Executives Anonymously Trashed on the Web – from Workplace Privacy Counsel
-
23 Things Not To Write In An E-mail – from NPR’s Planet Money
Wage & Hour
-
Employee’s Headache No Excuse For Insubordination – from FMLA Insights
-
77 Cents and Gender Discrimination: The Wrong Conclusion – from Stephanie Thomas at Compensation Cafe
-
FMLA Case Update – Lane v. Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital – from FMLA law
-
Watch for more FMLA claims about caring for aging parents – from Work Matters
Background Screening
-
Is Continuous Employment Screening on the Rise? – from Nick Fishman at the employeescreenIQ Blog
-
The Perils of Making Hiring Decisions With Personal Info Found Online – from TLNT
-
Checking Credit Reports? Check Your State Law First – from Nolo’s Employment Law Blog
Miscellaneous
-
Financial Reform: What Employers Can Expect – from Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives™
-
Manufacturers’ Hiring Stymied? – from The Word on Employment Law with John Phillips
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
If you want something to be a trade secret, don’t publish it
While it seems like common sense, for something to be a trade secret it must actually be secret. Rogers Indus. Prods. v. HF Rubber Machinery (Ohio Ct. App. 7/21/10) [pdf] serves as a good illustration. Rogers alleged that the various defendants had used confidential information about its tire curing press to copy the unique design of its system. Rogers’s problem was that it had publicly disclosed its press design in a patent application before the alleged trade secret theft. The court concluded there is no trade secret protection for confidential information that is disclosed in a published patent application, but that a factual issue existed as to whether the patent application disclosed the specific trade secret at issue.
Aside from not publishing trade secrets in patent applications (or other public documents), what are some of the other things your company should be doing to protect its trade secrets?
- Limited access on a need-to-know basis.
- Documents kept under lock and key.
- Password-protected data files.
- Confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements for anyone with knowledge or access.
- Lawsuits to recover stolen or misused secrets.
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
A chocolate cupcake by any other name…
The EEOC has settled a race and sex discrimination case against a local temporary agency, Area Temps. The EEOC alleged that the agency used code words to identify the race, color, and sex of candidates it placed with employers. For example, hockey player = white male, small hands = females, basketball player = African American men, and chocolate cupcake = young African American women. The EEOC alleged that Area Temps would attach note cards containing the coded phrases to job applications submitted to employers. The settlement will pay $650,000 to a nationwide class of 11,000 people.
The easy lesson from this case is that businesses should never use code words as a proxy to identify protected characteristics such as race and sex. There is also a deeper lesson to take away from this story. Claims against two of the employers who are alleged to have used the coded phrases to make job decisions remain pending in federal court. Employers are often jointly responsible with temporary agencies for acts of discrimination. In dealing with temporary agencies, businesses should be careful not to perpetuate discrimination fostered by the agency. Also, to the extent that you are able, businesses should negotiate indemnification clauses in staffing agreements with temporary agencies, so that if your business is sued for the discriminatory act of the agency, it will defend you (pay your attorneys’ fees) and hold you harmless (pay your portion of any settlement of or judgment on the claims).
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Do you know? Content of FMLA medical certifications
So often we get bogged down in the minutia of an employment law issue or a specific case. I thought that today, we’d take a step back and focus on something really basic—the mechanics of FMLA medical certifications.
When an employee take an FMLA leave for his or her own serious health condition, or that of a family member, an employer may require that the employee obtain a medical certification from a health care provider to certify that the medical condition qualified under the FMLA. The certification may seek the following information:
-
The name, address, telephone number, and fax number of the health care provider and type of medical practice/specialization.
-
The approximate date on which the serious health condition began, and its probable duration.
-
A statement or description of medical facts regarding the patient’s health condition for which FMLA leave is requested. The medical facts must be sufficient to support the need for leave. Such medical facts may include information on symptoms, diagnosis, hospitalization, doctor visits, whether medication has been prescribed, any referrals for evaluation or treatment (physical therapy, for example), or any other regimen of continuing treatment.
-
If the employee is the patient, information to establish that the employee cannot perform the essential functions of the job, the nature of any other work restrictions, and the likely duration of such inability.
-
If the patient is a covered family member with a serious health condition, information to establish that the family member is in need of care, and an estimate of the frequency and duration of the leave required to care for the family member.
-
If an employee requests leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis for planned medical treatment of the employee’s or a covered family member’s serious health condition, information to establish the medical necessity for such intermittent or reduced schedule leave and an estimate of the dates and duration of such treatments and any periods of recovery
-
If an employee requests leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis for the employee’s serious health condition, including pregnancy, that may result in unforeseeable episodes of incapacity, information to establish the medical necessity for such intermittent or reduced schedule leave and an estimate of the frequency and duration of the episodes of incapacity
-
If an employee requests leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis to care for a covered family member with a serious health condition, a statement that such leave is medically necessary to care for the family member, which can include assisting in the family member’s recovery, and an estimate of the frequency and duration of the required leave.
The Department of Labor has published two forms for employers to use for a health care provider to certify the need for FMLA leave: WH-380-E (for an employee’s own serious health condition), and WH-380-F (for a family member’s serious health condition). While these forms are optional, the DOL approves their use, they are available for free, they cover all of the permitted information, and leave no room for over-reaching. In other words, if you’re not using these forms, you should be.
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Monday, July 26, 2010
DOL provides guidance on break time for nursing moms
One of the lesser heralded provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (better known as the Health Care Reform Bill) is section 4207, which provides reasonable break time for nursing mothers. Unlike many provisions of the health care bill, which do not go into effect for several years, break times for nursing mothers went into effect as soon as President Obama signed the bill into law on March 23, 2010.
Last Friday, the Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division published Fact Sheet #73, which provides guidance to employers implementing this new break time requirement. Here’s the highlights:
-
Employers must provide “reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child for 1 year after the child’s birth each time such employee has need to express the milk.” The frequency and duration of each break will likely vary from employee to employee, and employers must provide breaks as frequently as needed by the nursing mother.
-
Employers must provide “a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, which may be used by an employee to express breast milk.” A bathroom, even if private, is not allowed. The location must be functional as a space for expressing breast milk. If the space is not dedicated to the nursing mother’s use, it must be available when needed. A space temporarily created or converted into a space for expressing milk or made available when needed by the nursing mother is sufficient provided that the space is shielded from view, and free from any intrusion from co-workers and the public.
-
This break time requirement only applies to non-exempt employees.
-
Employers with less than 50 employees are not subject to this break time requirement if compliance would impose an undue hardship (defined as the difficulty or expense of compliance for a specific employer in comparison to the size, financial resources, nature, and structure of the employer’s business).
-
Employers are not required to compensate nursing mothers for breaks taken for the purpose of expressing milk. However, where employers already provide compensated breaks, an employee who uses that break time to express milk must be compensated in the same way that other employees are compensated for break time.
Because Ohio does not have its own law that requires lactation breaks, Ohio employers should pay careful attention to this provision of the health care bill and the new requirements it imposes on all but the smallest of our state’s employers.
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Friday, July 23, 2010
WIRTW #136
When I write I post about which I’m particularly proud, I’ll ask my wife for her opinion, which is what I did last night for my post from yesterday on assholes. Her comment—that all of my readers would think that I had an awful time at the concert, which couldn’t be further from the truth. The music was awesome, we had a great dinner beforehand, and it’s always a joy to spend some rare time with my wife without kids.
Now that I’ve clarified, here’s what I read this week:
Bullying
-
When “sabotage” becomes illegal – from Michael Fox’s Jottings By An Employer’s Lawyer
-
New Laws Target Workplace Bullying – from Adam Cohen at Time.com
-
With Time and Parade, the workplace bullying legislative movement goes mainstream – from David Yamada’s Minding the Workplace
Wage & Hour
-
Clarity In Labor Law? You MUST Be Kidding – from Hartford Business Journal Online
-
Independent Contractor Safe Harbor Now a Minefield – from Michael Haberman’s HR Observations
-
DOL to Conduct “FMLA survery”: Is More Regulatory Change on the Horizon? – from FMLA Insights
-
When Plaintiff’s Lawyers Go Too Far – from Florida Employment Law Blog
-
Proactive Analyses as Management Conundrum? – from Stephanie Thomas’s The Proactive Employer
-
Children at Work: Employers May Face Stiff Fines for Employing Minors – from CPEhr
-
Here Comes An Avalanche of FLSA Cases: Employers Be Aware, Be Proactive! – from Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights
Technology & Social Media
-
Social Media Use in the Workplace Is on the Rise – from Forbes.com Velocity Blog
-
Corporate Social Media Policies: The Good, the Mediocre, and the Ugly – from Fast Company
-
It’s Like Alanis Morissette Was Using Her iPhone in her Government-Issued Cube – from Kris Dunn, The HR Capitalist
-
Use Twitter, Get Fired – from Molly DiBianca at the Delaware Employment Law Blog
-
Facebook hits 500 million user milestone – from Boy Genius Report
-
When Everyone Has Their Own Smart Phone, What Does That Mean for the “Workplace”? – from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog
Competition & Trade Secrets
-
Compete, Solicit, Tell Secrets: Is It Legal? Is It Wise? – from Going Concern
-
Motorola sues Huawei and several former employees for stealing wireless trade secrets – from Engadget Mobile
-
Minimizing the Risk that a New Hire Will Lead to Trade Secret Litigation: Some Simple Preventive Steps – from Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog
-
FusionStorm and Employees Get Hit With $10 Million Trade Secret Theft Verdict – from Trade Secrets Blog
Discrimination
-
After the investigation: what to do when the complainant is unhappy with the results – from Sindy Warren at the Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog
-
House Rules: Sex, Cocaine, and Strip Clubs – from Philip Miles’s Lawffice Space
-
A Modest Proposal for Maternity Leave – from You’re the Boss Blog
-
Employers Beware: ADA Claims On The Rise Now And Into The Foreseeable Future – from Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives™
Labor Relations
-
ScienceBlogs.com Bloggers Go on Strike, Issue Demands to Management – from Work in Progress
-
A Work Stoppage We Can All Support – from Jeffrey Hirsch at the Workplace Prof Blog
Miscellaneous
-
Celebrating Junior Achievement – from The ChamberPost
-
Credit Reports: The Value (and Risk) to HR Professionals – from Nick Fishman at TLNT
-
Five Ways Pixar Makes Better Decisions – from Tom Davenport at the Harvard Business Review
-
Dodd-Frank amends SOX; creates new whistleblower protections – from GT LE Blog
-
How Would The Dalai Lama Tell Someone To Fuck-Off? – from Bob Sutton
-
A classic offers lessons on firing employees – from Work Matters
-
HR - Friend or Foe – from Workplace Fairness
-
The Elements of Communication: Lawyerium – from KnowHR Blog
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.
For more information, contact Jon at (440) 695-8044 or JHyman@Wickenslaw.com.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.