Jury tags SHRM for $11.5 million in discrimination lawsuit

$11.5 million!

That's the number a jury needed to send a very loud, very clear message to the Society for Human Resource Management — the self-proclaimed standard-bearer of HR "best practices."

Last week's verdict against SHRM — $1.5 million in compensatory damages and a staggering $10 million in punitive damages — is not just a legal loss. It's an institutional indictment. When the organization that tells the rest of us how to run fair, lawful, ethical workplaces gets hit for racial discrimination and retaliation, the problem is bigger than one terminated instructional designer.

WIRTW #782: the 'lights' edition

I've always loved Christmas lights.

Maybe it’s because, growing up Jewish, we never decked out our house each December with strings of twinkling bulbs. So as an adult, one of my favorite nights of the entire year is the evening my family piles into the car and cruises around to take in the neighborhood displays. It's simple, it's cozy, and it never fails to make me smile.

Two houses just up the street from me perfectly capture the annual holiday condundrm:

🎄 Do you prefer "A" — the full Clark Griswold experience, with tens of thousands of lights, glowing inflatables, and enough wattage to be seen from the ISS?

🎄 Or "B" — the Hallmark Movie/Norman Rockwell classic, with warm white lights, clean lines, and understated charm?

While I absolutely appreciate the effort and awe of the Griswold approach (seriously, that's dedication!), my heart leans toward the quieter, timeless elegance of the Hallmark version.

So, I'm curious: which christmas-lights team are you on—A or B? And more importantly … why?

'Tis the season for strong opinions on holiday lighting. 

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Independent contractors and noncompete agreements do not mix

I've always believed that noncompetes and "independent contractor" status don't mix. Now I have an appellate opinion to back me up.

In Reliant Services v. Brown, a construction-staffing company tried to enforce a noncompete against a punch-list worker it had consistently called an independent contractor. Reliant wanted to stop him from doing the exact same punch-list work directly for Ryan Homes — the same work he'd been doing for decades before ever meeting Reliant.

Here's the problem: you can't call someone "independent," claim they run their own business, and then turn around and try to control where they work, who they can work for, and what they can do once they stop working for you. That's the very definition of control. And control is the dividing line between an employee and an independent contractor.

The most puzzling HR litigation strategy you’ll read this week

Every so often a litigation strategy comes along that just makes you stare at the screen, shake your head, and think, "Did a lawyer really decide this was the best idea, and how much did they bill for it?"

SHRM — the world's largest human resources trade group and an organization that literally brands itself as THE authority on HR — asked a federal court to prohibit a plaintiff from referring to it as an expert in human resources.

Yes, you read that right. SHRM didn't want a jury to hear that … SHRM is an expert in human resources.

The 12th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Corpse Killer

Some stories hit you like a punch to the gut. This one is a full-on knockout.

The House Ways and Means Committee just dropped a bombshell on the New Jersey Organ and Tissue Sharing Network—one of the nation's 55 federally designated organ procurement organizations. The details are disturbing.

According to a letter the Committee released, investigators have uncovered what they call "extreme abuse of public trust" and potentially illegal conduct.

If you aim to hit the legal floor, your workplace will always miss the mark

If your defense to a harassment complaint starts with "well, technically…" you've already lost — even if you win the lawsuit.

A recent Sixth Circuit decision, Wargo v. MJR Partridge Creek Digital Cinema, is the latest reminder that "not illegal" is a terrible benchmark for acceptable workplace behavior.

The court held that the manager's conduct toward a female subordinate — repeated dinner invitations, personal texts, following her in his car, blocking a door during an argument, even grabbing her arm for several seconds — didn't meet the very high bar for unlawful sexual harassment. The standard is "severe or pervasive."

Civil-rights enforcement isn't a culture-war trophy

The Wall Street Journal just profiled EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas under the headline "Trump's DEI Slayer Is Just Getting Started." On LinkedIn, Lucas replied, "thanks … that's right! Buckle up for more…"

It's… an odd flex.

Title VII protects everyone. Always has. White employees, men, Christians, and cisgender individuals are covered just the same as workers from traditionally marginized communities. Discrimination is discrimination, whoever the victim is.

But equal protection doesn't mean equal priority. And it doesn't mean the EEOC should treat anti-Christian bias, anti-American bias, or corporate DEI programs as the nation's most urgent civil-rights threats.

WIRTW #781: the 'EEOC' edition

"The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is expected to rescind guidance that addresses harassment based on gender identity. Should we remove mentions of gender identity from our anti-harassment policy?"

An HR professional recently asked that question to HR Dive.

Let me answer it as succinctly as possible: NO!!!

Or, if you prefer, let me rephrase question for clarity: "The EEOC says, 'Don't follow the law.' I'm confused. Shouldn't they be telling us the opposite?"

No matter what the EEOC now wants employers to believe, the law has not changed. Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination still includes discrimination based on transgender status. And because sex discrimination includes sexual harassment, it remains unlawful—legally, unquestionably, unequivocally—to harass an employee because they are transgender. The Supreme Court has already said this. Courts across the country have said this. The EEOC does not get to rewrite that reality by pretending otherwise.

But even if we play along with the EEOC's fiction for a moment, the law is a floor, not a ceiling. Nothing stops employers from choosing to protect their workers because it's the right thing to do. Your workplace policies should reflect your values, your culture, and your commitment to treating employees with respect—not the bare minimum that a politicized agency thinks it can get away with. Protecting transgender employees from harassment isn't only lawful. It's moral. It's responsible. It's who good employers are.

And frankly, the EEOC should be ashamed of itself. The agency charged with enforcing civil rights laws is now encouraging employers to ignore them. That isn't guidance; it's abandonment. Employers deserve clarity, not political gamesmanship.

So, no, do not remove gender identity from your anti-harassment policy. Keep it there. Keep following the actual law. And keep doing what the EEOC, apparently, won't: protecting all employees.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

What are you doing to protect your company's trade secrets and keep them secret?

Sherbrooke, a captive insurer for nursing homes, built proprietary software to price risk and underwrite policies. Three insiders—including the CTO who created the software—allegedly decided to spin up a competing insurer and started using that same software to run it.

Sherbrooke sued, claiming trade secret misappropriation.

The district court dismissed the claim, saying Sherbrooke hadn't alleged that it took sufficient "reasonable measures" to protect its secrets. The 4th Circuit reversed. At the pleading stage, the court said, robust confidentiality and invention-assignment agreements were enough to plausibly allege trade-secret protection and misappropriation.

If you think women ruined the workplace, the problem isn’t women — it’s you

The New York Times recently asked, "Did Women Ruin the Workplace?" After an online firestorm erupted, it quietly changed the headline to "Did Radical Feminism Ruin the Workplace." That edit says everything. This isn't about law or fairness. It's about resentment dressed up in intellectual clothes.

Nothing about American workplace law is "feminized." It's statutory, constitutional, and precedent-driven—by courts, by the way, long dominated by men.

Title VII is neutral. Since 1964, it's banned discrimination because of sex. The Supreme Court has made sure those protections apply equally to everyone. Feminism didn't twist the law; the law simply requries equality.

Leadership always starts at the top

"Quiet, Piggy."

 
That's what Donald Trump said to a female reporter over the weekend aboard Air Force One in response to a question she asked him about the Epstein Files.

We should all agree that Trump's response was inappropriate, disgusting, and deplorable.

Now, let's take this story off of Air Force One and into your workplace. When an employee is confirmed to have said something like "Quiet, Piggy" to a coworker, management's path is straightforward and non-negotiable.

WIRTW #780: the 'breakup' edition

"You deserve someone who loves you for who you are, not who they want you to be."

That's the heart of this week's episode of The Norah & Dad Show.

Norah got dumped, and we talk all about it:

• "Fake boundaries" (like rules about what she can wear, who she can hang out with, and how many drinks she's allowed)
• One-sided codependency (not her)
• Why being single in college is freeing
• And how two parents ended up on an emergency highway run to triage her mental health.

It's part heartbreak, part humor, and part masterclass in learning to walk away from unhealthy dynamics.

If you're raising (or working with) young adults, I think you'll get a lot out of this conversation. Here's a short preview.

Listen to the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, in your browser, or wherever you get your podcasts. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it truly helps!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

When you protest too much, we all think you're hiding something

If you're fighting this hard to hide a file, everyone already knows what's in it.

Donald Trump trying to stop the release of the Epstein files feels a lot like that lawyer in discovery who really doesn't want to turn over a document.

You know the type. They argue every privilege, invent new ones, insist it's "irrelevant," "burdensome," or "confidential." They huff and puff, threaten sanctions, and act personally insulted that anyone would even dare to ask for it.

Target's new "smile" policy has some serious legal problems

You can't policy your way to happy employees. But Target sure is trying.

The retailer just rolled out its new "10-4" policy. Employees must now (1) smile, make eye contact, wave, and use "welcoming body language" within 10 feet of any customer, and (2) when within 4 feet, personally greet guests and "initiate a warm, helpful interaction."

We all appreciate good customer service. But from an employment law and HR perspective, this policy raises some serious red flags.

A Veterans Day primer on USERRA

Every November 11, we pause to honor the men and women who've worn our nation's uniform. But beyond parades, flags, and "thank you for your service," there's another way employers can show real respect — by understanding and complying with USERRA, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

USERRA protects employees who serve in the military — whether active duty, National Guard, or Reserves — from discrimination and retaliation because of that service. It also guarantees their right to be reemployed when they return from duty.

The law is simple in principle but often mishandled in practice. Here are a few key reminders.

WIRTW #779: the 'fell in love with a band' edition

On August 10, 2001, I fell in love with a band.

I was at the Beachland Ballroom with my college roommate, who was in town visiting. He'd heard about an up-and-coming two-piece calling themselves The White Stripes and suggested we check them out.

When the first few chords of Dead Leaves and the Dirty Ground crashed through the speakers, I was hooked — instantly.

From that moment, with the raw, simple thunder of Jack and Meg White, something clicked. It was love at first note, and I fell hard. I've since passed that love on to my daughter, Norah, with whom I share a deep musical kinship (and to whom I proudly gave impeccable taste in music).

This Saturday, The White Stripes will be inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. And it feels not just appropriate, but inevitable. They didn't just ride a trend — they created one. As the Hall itself notes, they "reinvigorated rock & roll by returning it to its primal blues roots, proving that a duo with unique style could captivate."

That night at the Beachland changed how I heard music. I was lucky enough to see The White Stripes live four times before they disbanded, and Jack many more times across his various projects. I even had an unforgettable chance encounter with him in the House of Blues' Foundation Room before a Raconteurs show.

But that first show is etched. It was the beginning of a relationship that forever changed how I listen.

When their induction happens — with or without the notoriously reclusive Meg, with or without an on-stage reunion — I'll be thinking of that August night at the Beachland. I'll be thinking about how a two-piece from Detroit rewrote what live rock could feel like. And I'll be thinking about sharing that sound with my daughter, and what it means to pass that love on.

Read more about the band and their induction:

• The White Stripes join the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame − their primal sound reflects Detroit's industrial roots — via The Conversation
  
• Meg White's Drumming Spoke Louder Than Words — via The New York Times
• It's Long Past Time to Give Meg White Her Respect — via Rolling Stone
• Conan O'Brien To Join White Stripes Reunion? — via Alternative Nation

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

6th Circuit says no to NLRB's Thryv remedies

This is what it looks like when you win the litigation battle but lose the war.

Hannah Whitbeck worked as a shift supervisor at a Starbucks. She helped lead a union campaign, and a few months later, Starbucks fired her for leaving one employee alone in the store — a safety violation. The NLRB said that reason was pretext and that she was really fired because of her union activity. Yesterday, the 6th Circuit agreed.

But here's the BUT. While the appellate court agreed that Starbucks unlawfully fired a union organizer, it also held that the NLRB had seriously overstepped its authority when it awarded her significant monetary consequential damages.

Understanding the 'duties test' of the FLSA's administrative exemption

Your employees probably aren't as important as they think they are.

That's not mean. It's just the Fair Labor Standards Act talking.

One of the more misunderstood parts of the FLSA's administrative exemption — the one that supposedly covers "office" workers — is which officer workers it actually covers. The test sounds deceptively simple: to be exempt, an employee must exercise discretion and independent judgment in matters of significance to the business. Most people with a desk, a computer, and a job title ending in "coordinator," "specialist," or "administrator" think they qualify.

Spoiler: they don't.

Salaried doesn't always equal exempt

Just because an employee is paid a salary does not mean they are exempt from overtime.

I came across this question on Reddit:

"I work at a small logistics company—about 10 of us total. I'm the person handling invoices, shipments, and customer calls. My title sounds fancy ('operations associate'), but I don't manage anyone. Lately, I've been doing 55–60 hour weeks because we're short-staffed, but when I asked about overtime, my boss said, 'you're salaried, so that doesn’t apply.' Am I actually exempt just because I'm salaried? Or is my company taking advantage of that label?"

One of the biggest myths in wage and hour law is that being paid a salary automatically makes you exempt from overtime

11 best practices to prevent off-the-clock wage claims

Target recently agreed to pay $4.6 million to settle a class action by warehouse employees claiming they weren't paid for all their work time.

The hourly employees said they had to:
➛ Badge into the building
➛ Walk long distances to their workstations to clock in, and
➛ Go through mandatory security screenings after clocking out.

Target didn't pay those hourly employees for any of that time. Those few minutes each workday added up to millions of dollars.

3.65 million reminders that "do nothing" is the costliest workplace compliance strategy of all.

A federal-court jury just hit a pair of New York hotels (and their owners) with a $1.65 million compensatory and $2 million punitive damages verdict after a female assistant manager alleged residents sexually harassed her daily and management did nothing to stop it.

The facts are brutal — constant sexual comments, physical assaults, even being knocked unconscious by a thrown table. Her male counterpart didn't face the same abuse. Even worse, her bosses ignored or laughed off every complaint that she made. When she asked for a transfer, management said "no openings." Turns out, that wasn't true. She quit in fear for her safety. Then she sued.

The jury believed her. And they made sure the company and its leaders felt it.

This is why DEI gets demonized

Wells Fargo is reportedly settling a class-action lawsuit alleging it held phony job interviews to make its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives look better than they really were.

According to the complaint, Wells mandated that for all jobs paying at least $100,000, half the candidates interviewed had to come from diverse backgrounds — women, people of color, veterans, LGBTQ+ individuals, people with disabilities.

But the plaintiffs said those interviews were often shams, conducted after another candidate had already been selected.

WIRTW #778: the 'a$$hole' edition

On this week's episode of The Norah and Dad Show, Norah and I play a few rounds of "Am I the A--hole" — inspired by my purge of our garage that resulted in all Norah's unused pet-fish gear ending up in a dumpster. (And, yes, we both agree that in this story, I am, in fact, the a--hole). We then dive into some recent, and ghastlier, stories from the AITA subreddit. 

We also discuss the fairness (or lack thereof) of exams, get an update on Norah's sorority pledging, and run down our visit to see Grandmom and Grandpop in Philly over fall break.

You will find the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Correcting the press: unpaid leave after the FMLA expires

Let's play one of my favorite games: correct the press.
The Issue: unpaid leave as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

Cliff Kaplan, 65, worked for a beverage distributor at Beechwood Sales & Service for 16 years. Then came a diagnosis of stage-four esophageal cancer. He took unpaid medical leave under the FMLA while he underwent chemotherapy.

Twelve weeks later his manager called. His FMLA had just expired, and the company needed him back immediately. When Cliff said he wasn't physically able to return, they fired him. No severance, no discussion, no attempt to work it out. Just a letter ending a 16-year career.

A noose, a workplace, and a court that finally got it right

Imagine this. It's your employee's second day on the job. He climb into the cab of truck you've assigned him assigned to operate, and hanging from the rearview mirror is a noose.

That's what happened to Jhalil Croley, a Black heavy-equipment operator working for Frank Road Recycling. He was understandably terrified and reported the incident. He was later fired.

The trial court looked at those facts and somehow decided, as a matter of law, that a noose in your vehicle doesn't create a hostile work environment.

Thankfully, an Ohio appellate court had the legal sense (and humanity) to fix that mistake. It reversed summary judgment and correctly held that even a single incident of a noose directed at a Black employee can be severe enough to create a hostile work environment.

The EEOC is abdicating its responsibility to transgender workers; employers shouldn’t follow suit

Let's talk about the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — the federal agency charged with enforcing our nation's bedrock employment discrimination laws — which seems more interested in walking away from its duty than leaning into it.

Two recent lawsuits raise serious red flags about how the agency is functioning, or, more accurately, is not functioning.

WIRTW #777: the 'no kings' edition

* Image by Nathaniel Currier, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

If this were your workplace, would you tolerate it?

Politico just published leaked messages from Young Republican leaders — future GOP operatives, appointees, and elected officials, as well as at least one current elected official and a White House staffer — joking about gas chambers, praising Hitler, celebrating rape, and using racist slurs over 250 times.

JD Vance brushed it off as a "college group chat" and then blamed Democrats for stoking political violence. Donald Trump has yet to even address it.

This isn't "dark humor" or "college hijinks." It's hate speech. Hard stop.

100% healed policy = 100% ADA violation

This one's for every business who's ever said to a sick or injured worker, "We can't bring you back until you're 100%."

The EEOC announced a $200,000 settlement with Elon Property Management after it required employees returning from medical leave to provide a doctor's note saying they could return to work "without restrictions." Elon also required a doctor to sign off on a copy of the employee's job description — and refused to let employees back if they couldn't meet every demand.

The EEOC's response was clear: "Policies that require an employee to be 100% before returning to work are unlawful. Employers must assess whether an employee can perform the job with or without a reasonable accommodation."

"Same-actor" harassment isn't immune from Title VII.

A federal judge recently granted summary judgment to Verizon Wireless after it fired a Black employee who twice used the n-word in the store. The employee argued, in part, that because the word came from him (a member of the protected class), his termination was discriminatory.

The court wasn't having it and dismissed the employee's case. It held that Title VII doesn't enshrine a right to use slurs "within one's own protected group." Harassment is about the work environment it creates, not the speaker's identity.

Ohio beer is the best beer!

For years, I've told anyone who would listen that Ohio has the best beer in America. Now, we have the proof.

At this year's Great American Beer Festival — the country's largest professional beer competition — Ohio's breweries showed up and showed out. Eleven breweries from the Buckeye State brought home 21 medals overall — tied for sixth among all states and marking our best result ever.

The undisputed star of the festival, however, was my local, Fat Head's Brewery. No brewery won more medals than Fat Head's, which took home five in total: two golds, one silver, and two bronze.

🥇 Goggle Fogger — South German-Style Hefeweizen
🥇 Battle Axe — Strong Porter
🥈 Bone Head — Strong Red Ale
🥉 Hop JuJu — Imperial India Pale Ale
🥉 Excursion Journeyman — Specialty Non-Alcohol Beer

🏆 Fat Head's also won BREWERY OF THE YEAR (15,001 – 100,000 barrels). 🏆

Not to be outdone, its downstate compatriot, Cincinnati's Third Eye Brewing Co. won three medals of its also and Brewery of the Year (2,001 – 5,000 barrels).

From neighborhood taprooms to nationally recognized powerhouses, Ohio beer showed that it belongs on the stage with the industry's heavyweights.

So yeah, I'm proud to be a beer lawyer. But even more, I'm proud to stand with an industry that captures the best of Ohio — authentic, passionate, and quietly exceptional.

If you love beer, put Ohio on your map. The pints are top-notch, and the industry's people are even better. The lawyers? Not too shabby either. 😉

---

Click here for information on Wickens Herzer Panza's craft beer legal practice (or just email me).

For more info on Ohio's craft-beer industry as a whole, check out the Ohio Craft Brewers Assocation.

WIRTW #776: the 'secret diner' edition

Every now and then, I like to take this space and go hyper-local, to highlight something that makes my corner of Northeast Ohio special. Today, that something is Vino di Luca, a new restaurant in Olmsted Falls.

If you're a Cleveland-area foodie, the name Luca Sema probably rings a bell. His other restaurant, Luca West, has long been one of my favorites and is arguably one of the very best spots in Greater Cleveland. So I had little doubt that Vino Di Luca would be something special.

Vino di Luca sits in the heart of downtown Olmsted Falls, in a beautifully restored century-old building that used to house The Olde Wine Cellar. The cozy yet contemporary transformation is stunning. The space doubles as a restaurant and wine shop, and it somehow manages to make both feel seamless.

The menu is built around Italian small plates and pastas. We like to start with the polpetta (housemade meatballs) and a salad, then dig into their pastas — maybe the white truffle and ricotta-stuffed sacchetti, the orecchiette with shrimp, or the gnocchi with fresh mozzarella and spicy tomato sauce. Each dish feels both elevated, comforting, and delicious. Much of the menu is naturally gluten free, including the polpetta, and all pasta dishes can be made gluten free upon request.

And then there's the wine.

Because Vino di Luca also functions as a retail shop, the prices are retail, which means you can enjoy an incredible bottle without the restaurant markup. The selection leans Italian (which makes sense given the menu), but there's plenty of California, French, and even the occasional Portuguese bottle mixed in. Every label is thoughtfully chosen and genuinely good. There's also a full bar with a craft cocktail menu if you're not in the mood for wine.

If you go, and the weather cooperates, grab a table on the back porch overlooking the Rocky River. It's peaceful, scenic, and one of those hidden gems that makes you appreciate where you live.

So, if you find yourself southwest of Cleveland, do yourself a favor and stop into Vino di Luca. Order a few plates, open a bottle of something interesting, and settle in. It's the kind of place that reminds you why dining out — and supporting local — is such a joy.

Cheers!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Employers, you don't need to be right—you just need to be honest

If you're an employer disciplining or terminating an employee for workplace misconduct, you don't have to prove the employee did the bad thing—you just need to honestly believe they did.

In Welch v. Heart Truss & Engineering, the employer fired an employee it believed had spray-painted trusses with graffiti—including devil horns and cartoon boobs. (Yes, really.) The employee claimed the real reason for his firing was his disability and workers' comp history.

But the 6th Circuit didn't buy it. The employer's "honest belief" saved the day.

The importance of preaching (and training) calmness in the workplace

Until today, I had never heard the phrase, "gratuity riot." I bet you hadn't either.

It allegedly happened in Nashville, where a bartender, pushed past her limit by a bachelor party that ran up a large tab and left no tip, hurled a pitcher across the bar. Words were exchanged, bottles followed, and soon the bar was a scene out of a country-western apocalypse — stools overturned, beer spraying, a shattered glass everywhere.

By the time the police arrived, the bartender was under arrest for aggravated assault, inciting a riot, and destruction of property.

We can all shake our heads and mutter, "What a mess," but there's a real workplace lesson buried under the spilled beer and broken glass.

The 11th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Enslaving Episcopate

Every year I think I've hit rock bottom when it comes to my "Worst Employer" list. And every year, someone picks up a jackhammer and starts digging.

Let me introduce you to the Kingdom of God Global Church, led by "Apostle" David Taylor and his "executive director" Michelle Brannon.

According to federal prosecutors, these two masterminded what can only be described as a modern-day slave labor scheme wrapped in the trappings of religion. The FBI's August raid of Brannon's mansion revealed 57 victims of forced labor living in cramped, squalid quarters — while Brannon enjoyed seven Mercedes, two Bentleys, half a million dollars in gold bars, and a backyard full of marble statues.

A reminder from the DOL that not all “front-of-house” jobs are created equal

The Department of Labor just released a new Wage & Hour opinion letter on one of those topics that always makes restaurant and hospitality employers nervous — tip pooling under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The question is whether "front-of-house" oyster shuckers can be included in a tip pool with servers when the employer takes a tip credit toward minimum wage?

The DOL says yes — if those shuckers actually interact with customers.

WIRTW #775: the 'kindness' edition

What's wrong with kindness?

When I was a kid, I was taught: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."

I disagree. Words can wound. They can demean. They can normalize cruelty and strip people of dignity. That's not strength, but weakness dressed up as bravado.

This week I was reminded of the choice we face every day in how we use our words. In a series of since-deleted comments to my LinkedIn post about the illegality of calling Black employees "monkeys," someone proudly declared:

➡️ that calling others "monkeys" is just free speech,
➡️ that he can call "whoever he wants a monkey,"
➡️ and that anyone who challenges that is undermining his freedom.

Technically, he's right: the First Amendment protects his right to say it. But here's the important part: free speech is not free of consequences, nor is it free of responsibility.

Which brings me back to my question: what's wrong with kindness?

Kindness invites connection.
Kindness builds trust.
Kindness strengthens communities and workplaces.
Kindness takes less effort than cruelty.
Kindness is the simpler, stronger choice.

Cruelty may get you attention, but kindness earns you respect.

So maybe the real question isn't "What am I free to say?" but "How will my words define me?" and "What impact will my words have on the people who hear them?"

None of us should want to be remembered for the insults we hurled, but for the kindness we offered.

The same is true at work. Cultures built on cruelty don't last. They burn people out, drive away talent, and create environments where fear replaces trust.

On the other hand, cultures built on kindness endure. They attract people who want to contribute, they foster collaboration, and they create workplaces where employees feel valued and respected. Kindness isn't just a moral choice, it's the smart business strategy that sustains organizations.

Choose kindness. Always.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Religious "purity tests" are a Title VII accommodation no-no

"Are you really that religious?" is the wrong question for any employer to ask of an employee seeking a religious accommodation.

The 6th Circuit just handed down a decision in Bilyeu v. UT-Battelle that should serve as a warning to any employer tempted to test the "sincerity" of an employee’s religious belief.

Let's count the ways Pete Hegseth's speech would get your company sued

If Pete Hegseth were your CEO, I'd be drafting your EEOC position statement tomorrow.

You're not running the Department of War (née Defense), and your employees aren't soldiers. If you think, however, Hegseth's speech yesterday is a model for shaping culture in your workplace, here's a lawyer's caution: his words are an employment-law nightmare.

The 10th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Corpse-Concealing Taskmaster

On Sunday, September 21, 43-year-old UPS driver Shelma Reyna Guerrero was crushed to death inside a cargo trailer at a company facility. According to police, she was loading packages alone when a malfunctioning conveyor caused an avalanche of parcels to fall on her. A co-worker discovered her injured body, but by the time emergency responders arrived, she was already gone.

Her coworkers remembered her as warm, kind, and joyful: "She was so friendly, had a beautiful smile … it was so infectious."

UPS compounded the heartbreak of this preventable death with its response. Workers report that the company shut operations down for only two hours before restarting both shifts — while Shelma's body was still in the building. Some employees said management even covered her body with "sort bags" so coworkers wouldn't have to see the body bag encasing her remains.

Monkey see; monkey not do

Chalk one up to common-sense — the 6th Circuit just held that the word "monkey," when directed at a Black employee, constitutes a racially hostile work environment.

In Smith & Sneed v. P.A.M. Transport, the court reversed summary judgment for the employer and sent the case to trial.

WIRTW #774: the 'daughter' edition

Yesterday was National Daughters Day, not to be confused with National Transfer Money to Your Daughter's Account Day (Oct. 6), International Daughters' Day (Sept. 28), Father-Daughter Day (Oct. 12), or National Son and Daughter Day (also Sept. 28).

I happen to host a podcast with my daughter — The Norah and Dad Show. We just released our 55th episode, covering our recent visit during Parents Weekend at her university. We discuss: dining, shopping, soccer, and an absolutely awful homecoming football game, the difference between "speech pathology" and "speech therapy," the meaning of community service, and why I canceled our Hulu subscription.

Here's a quick clip to whet your appetite.

You'll find the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

The 9th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Malignant Museum

De'Mario Grant thought he'd landed his dream job in security at the de Young Museum, following his grandfather's footsteps. Instead, he got backbreaking 16-hour shifts, chronic pain, HR doubting his medical leave, and managers whispering behind his back. He sued and won, and yet management kept right on retaliating against him until they finally fired him.

What does a $100,000 H-1B visa fee mean for American businesses?

Donald Trump's recent Proclamation raises the fee for foreign nationals seeking entry into the U.S. on an H-1B to $100,000. 

[T]he entry into the United States of aliens as nonimmigrants to perform services in a specialty occupation under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the INA ... is restricted, except for those aliens whose petitions are accompanied or supplemented by a payment of $100,000.

This restriction lasts at least 12 months, with only narrow "national interest" exceptions.

WIRTW #773: the 'free speech' edition

"Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech; a Thing terrible to Publick Traytors."

— Benjamin Franklin, The New-England Courant, July 9, 1722.

"If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable."
— U.S. Supreme Court, Texas v. Johnson (1989).

"The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed — would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper — the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."
— George Orwell, 1984.

"Free speech is neither a privilege nor a partisan luxury. It's the oxygen of democracy. Without it, elections are hollow, dissent is branded illegitimate, or worse, and truth becomes whatever those in power decree. History shows that silencing speech is both the path by which authoritarians rise and the tool by which they endure."
— Jon Hyman, September 18, 2025.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Documentation + Process + Conduct = the three things you need to best bulletproof your termination decisions

How do you fireproof your workplace decisions from discrimination lawsuits? By doing exactly what Kent State University just did.

A transgender professor sued after being denied a leadership role and campus transfer, claiming sex discrimination. On appeal, the 6th Circuit affirmed the summary dismissal of the case, because the employer had its ducks in a row.

Here's what happened, and why the university won.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Employers need process, not panic, when the internet comes calling.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Yet Vice President JD Vance is urging the outrage mobs on. "When you see someone celebrating Charlie's murder, call them out and call their employer." That was his closing call to action as guest host of Charlie Kirk's podcast yesterday.

Plenty didn't need the nudge. Within 24 hours of Kirk's killing, employers nationwide—from media outlets to universities, airlines to retailers—were disciplining or firing staff over posts deemed "insensitive" or "celebratory" of his death.

A cottage industry of doxxing quickly formed. A site originally branded Expose Charlie's Murderers (since rebranded Charlie Kirk Data Foundation for obvious legal reasons) began cataloging names, employers, and posts. Activists like Laura Loomer pledged to ruin careers.

When does the workday begin and end for a remote worker?

With the rise of remote work, wage and hour laws have forced employers to grapple with what should be a straightforward question: When does a remote employee's workday actually begin and end?

In Lott v. Recker Consulting, the Southern District of Ohio offered a clear answer.

Kiara Lott and 130 of her fellow Patient Care Associates worked from home as call-center reps. Their day started with the familiar remote routine: coffee, logging in, Duo security, VPN, ADP timekeeping, Microsoft Teams, and then opening the phone system and workflow tools to handle patient calls.

They sued under the FLSA, claiming they weren't paid for the minutes spent booting up, logging in, authenticating, and later shutting down. The employer countered that all of that was non-compensable "preliminary" or "postliminary" time.

WIRTW #772: the 'drooly zerberts' edition

On this week's episode of The Norah and Dad Show, I check in with Norah as she kicks off her sophomore year of college. We talk about her experiences pledging a sorority, balancing two jobs, navigating classes, and how the dorm food is holding up.

It's a fun conversation about growth, responsibility, and finding your footing in year two of college life.

Below is a quick clip to whet your appetite.

You can listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

'Come on you Gunners!' as pretext for discrimination?

My family are Gooners. For the uninitiated, that means we're Arsenal Football Club supporters. My 17-year-old son is the most passionate of the lot.

On a recent layover in an airport lounge, Donovan was wearing his Arsenal kit when a man walked by, pointed at the crest, and with a British accent said: "Oy, you got some dirt on your chest."

It took Donovan a minute to process. And then, barely missing a beat, he got up, walked over to the man, and asked, "Are you a Spurs fan?" ("Spurs," short for Tottenham Hotspur, Arsenal's North London neighbor and most despised rival.)

The man replied, "I am."

To which Donovan, at the top of his lungs, yelled: "PISS OFF!"

Then he turned and walked back to our table, leaving the man chuckling with his family.

Can we still trust the EEOC to enforce our anti-discrimination laws?

The EEOC exists to combat workplace discrimination. Employers depend on it for guidance, employees depend on it for protection, and its credibility is what makes civil rights law meaningful in the workplace.

That's why the recent allegations against the agency itself are so concerning.

Marc Seawright, a transgender man and the EEOC's former Director of Information Governance and Strategy, alleges in his recently filed EEOC charge that the agency instructed him to scrub every mention of LGBTQ+ identities from its outreach materials. The agency created these materials to help employers understand their obligations under Title VII as defined by the Supreme Court in the Bostock case. According to Seawright, his expertise is now being "leveraged to perpetuate discrimination against people like me."

SCOTUS just green-lit racial profiling. This is bad. Really, really bad.

The Supreme Court just gave ICE the constitutional thumbs-up to profile people based on race, national origin, language, job, or where they happen to be.

A lower court had blocked ICE from detaining people by relying on appearance, accent, or occupation as a proxy for immigration status. On appeal, the Supreme Court, through a shadow-docket order, lifted that injunction. In plain English, ICE can once again use these factors to decide whom to stop, question, and detain.