The 10th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Corpse-Concealing Taskmaster

On Sunday, September 21, 43-year-old UPS driver Shelma Reyna Guerrero was crushed to death inside a cargo trailer at a company facility. According to police, she was loading packages alone when a malfunctioning conveyor caused an avalanche of parcels to fall on her. A co-worker discovered her injured body, but by the time emergency responders arrived, she was already gone.

Her coworkers remembered her as warm, kind, and joyful: "She was so friendly, had a beautiful smile … it was so infectious."

UPS compounded the heartbreak of this preventable death with its response. Workers report that the company shut operations down for only two hours before restarting both shifts — while Shelma's body was still in the building. Some employees said management even covered her body with "sort bags" so coworkers wouldn't have to see the body bag encasing her remains.

Monkey see; monkey not do

Chalk one up to common-sense — the 6th Circuit just held that the word "monkey," when directed at a Black employee, constitutes a racially hostile work environment.

In Smith & Sneed v. P.A.M. Transport, the court reversed summary judgment for the employer and sent the case to trial.

WIRTW #774: the 'daughter' edition

Yesterday was National Daughters Day, not to be confused with National Transfer Money to Your Daughter's Account Day (Oct. 6), International Daughters' Day (Sept. 28), Father-Daughter Day (Oct. 12), or National Son and Daughter Day (also Sept. 28).

I happen to host a podcast with my daughter — The Norah and Dad Show. We just released our 55th episode, covering our recent visit during Parents Weekend at her university. We discuss: dining, shopping, soccer, and an absolutely awful homecoming football game, the difference between "speech pathology" and "speech therapy," the meaning of community service, and why I canceled our Hulu subscription.

Here's a quick clip to whet your appetite.

You'll find the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

The 9th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Malignant Museum

De'Mario Grant thought he'd landed his dream job in security at the de Young Museum, following his grandfather's footsteps. Instead, he got backbreaking 16-hour shifts, chronic pain, HR doubting his medical leave, and managers whispering behind his back. He sued and won, and yet management kept right on retaliating against him until they finally fired him.

What does a $100,000 H-1B visa fee mean for American businesses?

Donald Trump's recent Proclamation raises the fee for foreign nationals seeking entry into the U.S. on an H-1B to $100,000. 

[T]he entry into the United States of aliens as nonimmigrants to perform services in a specialty occupation under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the INA ... is restricted, except for those aliens whose petitions are accompanied or supplemented by a payment of $100,000.

This restriction lasts at least 12 months, with only narrow "national interest" exceptions.

WIRTW #773: the 'free speech' edition

"Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech; a Thing terrible to Publick Traytors."

— Benjamin Franklin, The New-England Courant, July 9, 1722.

"If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable."
— U.S. Supreme Court, Texas v. Johnson (1989).

"The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed — would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper — the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."
— George Orwell, 1984.

"Free speech is neither a privilege nor a partisan luxury. It's the oxygen of democracy. Without it, elections are hollow, dissent is branded illegitimate, or worse, and truth becomes whatever those in power decree. History shows that silencing speech is both the path by which authoritarians rise and the tool by which they endure."
— Jon Hyman, September 18, 2025.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Documentation + Process + Conduct = the three things you need to best bulletproof your termination decisions

How do you fireproof your workplace decisions from discrimination lawsuits? By doing exactly what Kent State University just did.

A transgender professor sued after being denied a leadership role and campus transfer, claiming sex discrimination. On appeal, the 6th Circuit affirmed the summary dismissal of the case, because the employer had its ducks in a row.

Here's what happened, and why the university won.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Employers need process, not panic, when the internet comes calling.

Outrage mobs shouldn't run your HR department. Yet Vice President JD Vance is urging the outrage mobs on. "When you see someone celebrating Charlie's murder, call them out and call their employer." That was his closing call to action as guest host of Charlie Kirk's podcast yesterday.

Plenty didn't need the nudge. Within 24 hours of Kirk's killing, employers nationwide—from media outlets to universities, airlines to retailers—were disciplining or firing staff over posts deemed "insensitive" or "celebratory" of his death.

A cottage industry of doxxing quickly formed. A site originally branded Expose Charlie's Murderers (since rebranded Charlie Kirk Data Foundation for obvious legal reasons) began cataloging names, employers, and posts. Activists like Laura Loomer pledged to ruin careers.

When does the workday begin and end for a remote worker?

With the rise of remote work, wage and hour laws have forced employers to grapple with what should be a straightforward question: When does a remote employee's workday actually begin and end?

In Lott v. Recker Consulting, the Southern District of Ohio offered a clear answer.

Kiara Lott and 130 of her fellow Patient Care Associates worked from home as call-center reps. Their day started with the familiar remote routine: coffee, logging in, Duo security, VPN, ADP timekeeping, Microsoft Teams, and then opening the phone system and workflow tools to handle patient calls.

They sued under the FLSA, claiming they weren't paid for the minutes spent booting up, logging in, authenticating, and later shutting down. The employer countered that all of that was non-compensable "preliminary" or "postliminary" time.

WIRTW #772: the 'drooly zerberts' edition

On this week's episode of The Norah and Dad Show, I check in with Norah as she kicks off her sophomore year of college. We talk about her experiences pledging a sorority, balancing two jobs, navigating classes, and how the dorm food is holding up.

It's a fun conversation about growth, responsibility, and finding your footing in year two of college life.

Below is a quick clip to whet your appetite.

You can listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, on our website, or through your favorite podcast app. And if you enjoy it, please like, review, and subscribe—it really helps us grow!

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

'Come on you Gunners!' as pretext for discrimination?

My family are Gooners. For the uninitiated, that means we're Arsenal Football Club supporters. My 17-year-old son is the most passionate of the lot.

On a recent layover in an airport lounge, Donovan was wearing his Arsenal kit when a man walked by, pointed at the crest, and with a British accent said: "Oy, you got some dirt on your chest."

It took Donovan a minute to process. And then, barely missing a beat, he got up, walked over to the man, and asked, "Are you a Spurs fan?" ("Spurs," short for Tottenham Hotspur, Arsenal's North London neighbor and most despised rival.)

The man replied, "I am."

To which Donovan, at the top of his lungs, yelled: "PISS OFF!"

Then he turned and walked back to our table, leaving the man chuckling with his family.

Can we still trust the EEOC to enforce our anti-discrimination laws?

The EEOC exists to combat workplace discrimination. Employers depend on it for guidance, employees depend on it for protection, and its credibility is what makes civil rights law meaningful in the workplace.

That's why the recent allegations against the agency itself are so concerning.

Marc Seawright, a transgender man and the EEOC's former Director of Information Governance and Strategy, alleges in his recently filed EEOC charge that the agency instructed him to scrub every mention of LGBTQ+ identities from its outreach materials. The agency created these materials to help employers understand their obligations under Title VII as defined by the Supreme Court in the Bostock case. According to Seawright, his expertise is now being "leveraged to perpetuate discrimination against people like me."

SCOTUS just green-lit racial profiling. This is bad. Really, really bad.

The Supreme Court just gave ICE the constitutional thumbs-up to profile people based on race, national origin, language, job, or where they happen to be.

A lower court had blocked ICE from detaining people by relying on appearance, accent, or occupation as a proxy for immigration status. On appeal, the Supreme Court, through a shadow-docket order, lifted that injunction. In plain English, ICE can once again use these factors to decide whom to stop, question, and detain.

What would you do if ICE showed up at your door?

Last Thursday, nearly 500 federal, state, and local officers descended on Hyundai's under-construction EV battery plant. By the end of the day, 475 workers—most of them Korean nationals—were in custody.

The raid was massive: roadblocks, a boat fishing people out of a sewage pond, workers hiding in air ducts. Agents asked every worker for identifying information before clearing some to leave and detaining the rest. It was the largest single-site enforcement action in Homeland Security history.

Hyundai has said that some arrested were not its direct employees but contractors or subcontractors. Still, construction of the $5.5 billion facility is now halted. South Korea dispatched diplomats. Lawsuits will almost certainly follow.

WIRTW #771: the 'americana' edition

Should out to the best band in the land, Old 97's. On Wednesday they will receive a Lifetime Achievement Award at the 2025 Americana Awards & Honors in Nashville. This honor is so well earned. They are an alt-Americana pioneer who have been making great music with the same lineup since 1994. In my humble opinion, this is also long overdue. 

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Does the NLRA protect the lone-wolf complainer?

When does the National Labor Relations Act protect as "concerted" the workplace complaints of a "lone wolf"? More often than you think.

In Miller Plastic Products, Inc. v. NLRB, A fabricator questioned whether the company at which worked early during the Covid pandemic was truly "essential." He challenged return-to-work protocols at an all-hands meeting and again later during a one-on-one with his manager, and urged a coworker with health risks to speak up. Days later, he was fired for "talking, attitude, and productivity."

Waxing philosophical: workplace speech vs. anti-discrimination law

Federal anti-discrimination laws protect people, not the content of their speech. Amy Wax, a Penn law professor (who, frankly, should have known better) just learned this lesson the hard way.

The law school disciplined her for what the it labeled "flagrant unprofessional conduct" stemming from a string of statements she made—some in the classroom, others in media—that denigrated racial minorities and others, including:

• Insinuating that Black people are inherently inferior to whites.
• Asserting the U.S. would be "better off with more whites and fewer nonwhites."
• Telling a Black colleague it's "rational to be afraid of Black men in elevators."
• Dismissing interracial marriage as misguiding advertising.
• Commenting on a podcast that Black women are "single moms with a bunch of guys who float in and out."
• Saying same-sex relationships are selfish and not about community or family.
• Claiming the country is better off with "fewer Asians" and describing them as resentful and envious of Western achievements.

Wax sued, claiming that punishing her for years of inappropriate racist, sexist, and homophobic statements was discrimination against her as a White Jewish woman.

WIRTW #770: the 'season 4' edition

This week marks the launch of season 4(!) of The Norah and Dad Show podcast.

Norah and I chat about our summer, which included a trip to Boston + a trip to Peniche, and her getting settled in for her sophomore year away at college. It also included some unwanted visitors getting to know Norah a little too well (which you can hear all about in the clip below).

As an aside, we had a great summer having Norah home. It is different having an adult-aged child, and I genuinely enjoyed getting to know my daughter as an adult and developing a different type of relationship with her. 10/10. Highly recommended.

You can listen to this full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Overcast, the web, and everywhere else you get your podcasts. And while you're there, hit the subscribe button to make sure you get new episodes delivered to you when they drop every other Tuesday.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Marijuana legalization ≠ job protection

In Flannery v. Peco Foods, the 8th Circuit just provided a sharp reminder of how far the gap can be between what's "legal" for individuals and what's protected in the workplace.Flannery was fired after a drug test showed THC in his system. He said it came from CBD oil, pointed to the company handbook, and argued his levels were under the listed threshold. None of it mattered. He worked in an at-will employment state, and the court said plainly: employers can terminate "for good cause, no cause, or even a morally wrong cause."

That same lesson applies in Ohio, even after the state legalized recreational marijuana use last year and medical marijuana five years earlier.

Here's what Ohio law says about marijuana and employment:

Defending the "kitchen sink" discrimination lawsuit

Arnett Moore, a 51-year-old Baptist Black man, worked as a Division Manager for Avon. When Avon restructured, the company compared the performance of division managers in the region. Moore's numbers came in last. The decision-makers documented the process, applied objective sales data, and had multiple levels of approval. As a result, Avon fired Moore.

Moore then sued. First, he said Avon discriminated against him because of his disability or perceived disability Then he added sex. Then age. Then, race. And even religion. In the end, his complaint alleged six different forms of discrimination.

WIRTW #769: the 'slavery' edition

Donald Trump wants to make slavery great again.

In a rant on Truth Social, he fumed: "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was… We are not going to allow this to happen.… This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE."

I can't believe I have to write this, but yes, slavery really was THAT BAD. Worse than bad. It was a centuries-long system of forced labor, racial terrorism, family separation, rape, murder, and dehumanization. It was chattel slavery—the commodification of human beings—on a scale unmatched in the Western world. It was, without exaggeration, the greatest moral stain on American history. Saying otherwise only displays your ignorance and bigotry.

Read the rest of this post at my Authoritarian Alarm Substack. (And while you're there, don't forget to subscribe.)

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

🚨 The Fifth Circuit Just Took Aim at the NLRB – And Potentially Every Federal Agency 🚨

This week, the Fifth Circuit handed down a decision in SpaceX v. NLRB that could fundamentally alter how federal labor law—and much of the administrative state—functions.

The court upheld injunctions blocking NLRB enforcement proceedings, ruling that the Board’s structure is likely unconstitutional because its members and administrative law judges are insulated from at-will removal by the President.

The 8th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Gender Corroborator

Policies on paper don't protect people. Training does. And this Buffalo Wild Wings location failed… spectacularly.

In April, 18-year-old Gerika Mudra went to dinner with a friend. When she went to the women's restroom, a server followed her in, banged on the stall door, and shouted: "This is a women's restroom. The man needs to get out of here."

Gerika—who is a biracial lesbian, not transgender—came out and said, "I am a lady." Instead of apologizing, the server doubled down: "You have to get out now." Feeling she had no other way to be believed, Gerika unzipped her hoodie to show she had breasts. Only then did the server leave. She has now filed a charge of discrimination against the restaurant

Your contracts are a culture test

Contracts are a culture test. This winery failed.

This summer, my daughter, a singer/songwriter, had a contract to perform four gigs at a local winery. She played the first three. Then, the winery's GM emailed her to say they were "going in a different direction" with their music and her "vibe no longer fit." He canceled her fourth gig.

Here's the problem: The contract (their contract; they proposed it and drafted it) only allowed them to cancel for "unforeseen circumstances." Changing the "vibe" plainly doesn't qualify. She politely pointed that out in an email response and asked when to expect payment. Crickets. For over a week.

Appeal court guts protections against customer harassment

Thanks to the 6th Circuit, customer-facing employees are now a whole lot less safe at work.

Dorothy Bivens worked as a sales rep for Zep, Inc. A few months into the job, she visited a motel client. The client's manager locked his office door, asked her out twice, and only let her leave when she said no. She reported it to her supervisor, who reassigned the account so she'd never have to see that customer again. A short time later, Zep cut her position in a COVID-era reduction in force. She then sued for hostile work environment, retaliation, and race discrimination.

The 6th Circuit just tossed all her claims. The retaliation and race claims fell apart for lack of proof the decision-makers knew about her complaint or targeted her for her race. But the headline here is the harassment claim.

When your supervisor flips to Team Union…

Rising Star Coffee Roasters is in the middle of a full-blown labor meltdown—protests, police, firings, a closed store. And right in the thick of it? At least one supervisor who decided to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the employees attempting to unionize.

That's not just awkward; it's dangerous for an employer. But the employer isn't without remedies. They just have to exercise them with care.

Under the NLRA, supervisors aren't covered “employees” and have zero legal protection to engage in union activity. You can discipline or terminate them for it, as long as you're not punishing rank-and-file employees in the process. The law sees them as management. When they cross the line, they're not "organizing," they're undermining the company from inside the chain of command.

WIRTW #768: the 'Peniche' edition

If you find yourself traveling through Portugal, don't overlook Peniche. This coastal town—set on a peninsula that juts into the Atlantic—is the westernmost city in continental Europe. Peniche is best known for four things: fishing, scenic vistas, surfing, and its long, wide, beautiful beaches. It also happens to be one of my favorite places in the world. 

Just an hour north of Lisbon and two hours south of Porto, Peniche makes an ideal stopover for a few days of relaxation between the two (as we did on our first trip to Portugal) or a beach vacation in its own right (as we did on our most recent visit).

Here are my suggestions for the top 7 things to do in and around Peniche:

1. Take a day trip to Berlenga Island: Hop on a boat to this stunning nature reserve, a UNESCO biosphere reserve,  for hiking, snorkeling, and exploring the 17th-century São João Baptista fort.

2. Wander the medieval streets of Óbidos: Step back in time in this charming walled town, known for its cobblestone alleys, whitewashed houses, and ginja, cherry liqueur served in chocolate cups.

3. Walk the rugged trail to Ilha do Papôa: Explore this small, rocky island connected by a narrow land bridge, offering stunning views, dramatic cliffs, and a touch of wild isolation just steps from town.

4. Catch world-class waves at Supertubos Beach: Peniche’s legendary surf spot known for its powerful barrels and international surf competitions. It's also much calmer in the summer, and there are dozens of surf schools that will teach any beginner. (Or, just walk the beach and watch others tempt the surf.)

5. Visit the Fort of Peniche: Explore this historic fortress-turned-political-prison that now serves as a powerful museum of Portugal's resistance to dictatorship.

6. Stroll the scenic cliffs at Cabo Carvoeiro: Marvel at dramatic ocean views and unique rock formations at Peniche’s westernmost point, which is even better when the sun is setting.

7. Explore the open-air art of Buddha Eden: 25 minutes from Peniche, you can stroll through acres of peaceful gardens filled with giant Buddha statues, contemporary sculptures, beautiful flora, and peacocks (so many peacocks) in Europe's largest Asian garden.

Bonus tip: Drive five minutes north up the coast along Baleal Beach, and eat brunch or lunch at Tugo's. The sandwiches and salads are the best around and the chill vibe blends well with the beach-town atmosphere. Ask for Hugo and tell him that Jon from Ohio sent you.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

It's wrong. It should have never been said. But is it illegal discrimination?

"Old man, you been here longer than I've been alive. Are you ready to retire?"

Kenneth Lowe had worked at Walbro for over 40 years. In 2018, at age 60, he was fired. According to the company, his position as Area Manager was no longer needed. According to Lowe, it was age discrimination.

He sued, claiming his supervisor had made several age-related comments, including the one above, which was said during a ceremony celebrating Lowe's 40th work anniversary. Lowe said his boss also made other comments like "let the old guy do it," and "are you losing a step?"

At trial, the jury bought it. They gave Lowe over $2.3 million in damages. But the judge threw out the verdict and entered judgment for the company instead. The 6th Circuit just affirmed.

🚨 You can't ask that: Disability questions in hiring 🚨

Yesterday, a commenter noted on LinkedIn that many individuals with disabilities suffer in silence at work because they're afraid to disclose their disability during the hiring process—worried it might get them screened out. "There are dueling incentives for claiming or not claiming a disability, and the pendulum has swung hard towards staying as masked as possible if you don't want to end up in application purgatory," he wrote.

I wholeheartedly disagree. It is 100% illegal to ask an applicant this question in a job interview: "Do you have any medical conditions we should know about?" It's a per se ADA violation and a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Just because an employee says he has a disability doesn't mean he actually does

The University of Nebraska fired James Trambly, an IT support specialist, for violating university policy by removing a hard drive from a university-owned computer without authorization. The termination followed a year of documented performance issues—poor communication, overstepping into colleagues' work, visible frustration, interrupting clients, and spending excessive time on service calls.

After his termination, Trambly sued for disability discrimination and retaliation, claiming the university was aware of his "mental impairment": attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

WIRTW #767: the 'cerveja' edition

When part of your business involves providing legal representation to craft breweries, even vacation means finding a beer garden where you can sit, relax, and sample the local brews.

Saúde to Letaria, a craft brewery tucked inside Óbidos, Portugal—a 12th-century walled town that feels straight out of a fairytale. The beer was excellent, and the quiet beer garden offered the perfect escape from the bustle of a crowded summer weekend in this popular tourist hub.

If you ever find yourself there, don't skip the ginja, a sour cherry liqueur served in chocolate cups and sold all over town. It's as fun as it is delicious.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Breaking down the proper way to handle an extended medical leave of absence

I spend a lot of time calling out employers who mishandle workplace issues. Today, I'm highlighting one that got it right.

Leanna Coffman was a Nexstar Media employee who suffered serious pregnancy-related complications and took 12 weeks of FMLA leave after giving birth. When her FMLA leave expired, Nexstar continued to provide support—giving her months of additional time off and approving her short-term disability benefits.

But when she still couldn't return to work six months after going out on leave, and also couldn't provide a clear return date, Nexstar made the difficult decision to terminate her.

So she sued for discrimination and FMLA retaliation. She lost on all counts. Why? Because Nexstar handled this situation correctly. They followed the law, communicated clearly, documented their decisions, and gave Coffman much more than the law required.

The Feds say that proselytizing at work is okay, but it shouldn't be

"The power of Christ compels you!" … could soon be coming to a workplace near you.

The Trump administration has issued new guidance allowing federal employees to display religious items at their desks, pray in groups off the clock, and even try to convert their coworkers.

You read that right. Government employees can now "attempt to persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views" and "encourage their coworkers to participate in religious expressions of faith, such as prayer, to the same extent that they would be permitted to encourage coworkers participate in other personal activities," so long as it's not "harassing in nature."

The 6 hard truths of litigation

I pay my mortgage and my kids' school tuition thanks to how long lawsuits take and how expensive they are.

Still, we need to have a frank conversation about exactly that: how long lawsuits take, and how much they cost.

Xerox just ended a 13-year legal saga with a $9.1 million settlement to a class of 5,700 call center employees. The lawsuit challenged the company's Achievement-Based Compensation plan, which paid employees by task and offered bonuses to meet minimum wage thresholds—but didn't cover time spent logging in, waiting between calls, or doing other required non-task work.

Think about that. Years of disruption. Thousands of work hours lost to discovery, motions, depositions, hearings, and appeals. Millions in legal fees. All to land on a settlement that isn't remotely material to a $7 billion company.

WIRTW #766: the 'empathy' edition

Forty years ago this week, the world came together. On July 13, 1985, Live Aid united millions across borders—not out of politics, but out of compassion. No cynicism. No culture wars. Just humanity responding to suffering.

Can you imagine that happening today?

In a time when empathy is mocked as weakness and "America First" is used to justify indifference, we need to remember what real leadership—and real decency—looks like.

Over at my Substack, I share what Live Aid teaches us about the power of compassion—and why rediscovering it may be our best hope against rising authoritarianism.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Strollers and stouts can coexist: making the case for family-friendly breweries

There's a growing trend in craft beer: no kids allowed.

Forest City Brewery, for example, recently banned guests under 16. They cite too many safety issues involving unsupervised toddlers and distracted parents.

They're not alone. Breweries across the country are shifting to adults-only policies… or at least adults-only hours.

I get it. Staff shouldn't have to dodge strollers or play babysitter. And if someone really pulled out a travel potty in the middle of a taproom (as one brewery reported)? Yikes! That's not just inappropriate; it's gross.

When your top talent drops the leg on your trade secrets…

Carma HoldCo—the company behind the Real American Beer concept—is laying the legal smackdown on two of its former execs, Chad Bronstein and Nicole Cosby.

Real American Beer is the light lager co-founded by wrestling legend Hulk Hogan. It's got a red-white-and-blue brand identity, a distribution deal with Walmart, and is being billed as the "official beer of WWE." It's a high-profile brand with big backing and even bigger stakes.

Carma alleges Bronstein and Cosby developed branding and business plans for the beer while still on the payroll, then body-slammed their confidentiality obligations by launching the same beer under their own company, RAHM (d/b/a Real American Beer), after getting the boot.

Being a workplace star doesn't excuse bad behavior. In fact, it demands more accountability, not less.

Teenage football phenom Lamine Yamal made headlines for all the wrong reasons this weekend. At his 18th birthday party, he allegedly hired people with dwarfism as entertainment, prompting widespread public backlash and legal complaints from disability rights organizations. The accusation: dehumanizing behavior that treats the disabled as props for amusement is discriminatory and undermines basic dignity.

Let's pivot from the pitch to the workplace.

Too often, high performers or rainmakers are given a pass. Their results insulate them. They cross lines, bullying coworkers, making inappropriate jokes, creating uncomfortable or even hostile environments. Leadership and HR look the other way because "they're too valuable to lose."

WIRTW #765: the 'It's a Bird… It's a Plane…' edition

Superman is an undocumented immigrant who punches Nazis. And if that makes him "woke," then maybe we need more woke heroes.

MAGAworld is melting down over James Gunn's Superman reboot because Gunn says that its a story about "immigrants and basic human kindness." Kellyanne Conway called it a woke lecture. Jesse Watters said his cape should say “MS13.”

Let's be clear: Superman has always been political.

• Created by two Jewish kids in 1938.
• A refugee from a dying planet.
• The Champion of the oppressed.
• A symbol of anti-fascism, decency, and justice.

If you think Superman is too political or too woke, you're not only misunderstanding him. You're also siding with the fascists he was created to punch.

I just wrote a full Substack piece digging into Superman's immigrant roots, his Jewish allegory, and why calling him "superwoke" completely misses the point. 

🧵 Read the full post here.
📬 And if you're not already subscribed to my Authoritarian Alarm Substack, what are you waiting for? Subscribe here.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Apple takes a bite of the NLRB in 5th Circuit ruling

In the workplace, not all questions are coercive and not all policy enforcements are discriminatory.
Case in point: Apple v. NLRB, in which the 5th Circuit just handed the tech giant a full reversal, rejecting findings by the Board that the company violated the NLRA by:

1. Coercively interrogating an employee about union activity; and

2. Removing union flyers from a breakroom table.

Let's unpack why Apple won, and what it means for employers navigating union-organizing campaigns.

Yes, you can be fired for what you say outside of work… especially when it's hateful.

In Darlingh v. Maddaleni, the Seventh Circuit just upheld the firing of a school counselor who gave a profanity-laced anti-trans tirade at a public rally. She promised "not a single" student under her watch would "ever, ever transition," and made sure to identify herself as a Milwaukee Public Schools employee while doing it. 

She sued, claiming the school district violated her First Amendment rights by terminating her. The 7th Circuit disagreed.

The 7th nominee for The Worst Employer of 2025 is … The Sadistic Chef

A jury just awarded $3.15 million to 22-year-old Andrew DeBellis—a sous chef who, over a brutal 2.5-month stretch, was punched, slapped, kicked, and emotionally destroyed inside the kitchen of fine-dining restaurant Margotto Hawaii.

Not by a rogue coworker.
Not in a moment of heat.
But daily.
By his executive chef—and with full knowledge of the owner.

The details are appalling. 

Title VII requires harm; not just hate

This week, America First Legal, a right-wing conservative organization founded by Stephen Miller, fired off a letter to the EEOC accusing the Los Angeles Dodgers and Guggenheim Partners of violating Title VII because of their publicly commitment to workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion.

But there's the legal twist: AFL didn't name a single person who was denied a job, demoted, fired, or otherwise harmed. Nor did it claim any injury to itself. 

The "Restoring Biological Truth to the Workplace Act" isn't about truth, it's about protecting bigotry

It's called the Restoring Biological Truth to the Workplace Act.

But let's be honest: it's just a license to discriminate.

Senator Jim Banks' recently introduced bill isn't about truth. It's about control. And cruelty. It would allow employees to misgender their transgender colleagues with impunity and prohibit employers from enforcing any workplace policies that require respect for a person's gender identity.

You want to avoid a labor union in your business? Then don't do this.

Two pediatricians at Cleveland's University Hospitals used an internal physician directory to contact colleagues about forming a union. In response, they say that UH disciplined them for trying to unionize. They've filed unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB.

Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act protects employees' rights to engage in concerted activity—including organizing a union and discussing it with co-workers. That protection applies whether you're a warehouse worker or a pediatric subspecialist.

WIRTW #764: the 'substack' edition

Introducing Authoritarian Alarm: 

A New Home for a Critical Conversation

For the past 18+ years, I've written about the intersection of law, policy, and the American workplace. But more and more, the news I feel compelled to cover—and the commentary I'm driven to write—has expanded far beyond employment law and HR drama.

Because the truth is, something much bigger is happening in this country.

America today barely resembles the nation it claims to be. In our institutions, our politics, and even our public discourse, we're beginning to mirror the authoritarianism we've spent the last 249 years claiming to oppose. We're becoming what the Founding Fathers created this country to resist.

So I've launched something new: Authoritarian Alarm—a Substack newsletter dedicated to tracking America’s quickening slide into authoritarianism. My first post is now available: We've become everything we've fought against for 249 years.

If you've valued my perspective on these issues before, I hope you'll join me there. Subscribe, share, and help me sound the alarm.

Because silence is complicity.
And democracy doesn't defend itself.

—

👉 Subscribe now for free to Authoritarian Alarm: https://jonhyman.substack.com

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

Without HR, you're not running a business. You're running a liability factory.

"I want to be the first company without HR."

That's the viral line from Jennifer Sey, who founded XX-XY Athletics in March 2024. She thinks Human Resources is just the "social-justice police." According to her, they are nothing more than a department of hall monitors: "They produce nothing. They monitor our words. They tell us what we can and cannot say. They inhibit creativity. It's bad for business."

Let's clear this up:
HR is not the problem.
HR is not your censor.
HR is not some DEI-driven thought police force trying to ruin your fun.

PIPs are performance improvement plans, not employee termination plans

The point of a performance improvement plan isn't to fire someone, it's to help them improve. It's right there is the name. But too often, PIPs aren't about performance or improvement.

For example, in Murphy v. Caterpillar Inc., the 7th Circuit just reversed summary judgment on the employee's age discrimination claim, and the court's reasoning serves as a stern warning to any employer using PIPs as a shortcut to termination.

Here's what Caterpillar got wrong about the PIP it delivered to Brian Murphy, a 58-year-old engineer:

I want my records back, records back, records back

When you destroy the evidence that could justify a termination, don’t be surprised when a court refuses to take your side. That's the message from the 6th Circuit's recent decision in Kean v. Brinker International, Inc., where a 59-year-old general manager of a Chili's, owned and operated by Brinker International, was fired despite running one of the most successful stores in his market.

Brinker claimed he was let go for not "living the Chili's way"—an amorphous explanation about bad "culture." Instead, Kean claimed age discrimination, supported by his stellar performance records and his post-firing replacement by someone 26 years his junior.

Brinker, however, could not support any its reasons for Kean's termination because it had destroyed all of the documents related to the termination.

WIRTW #763: the 'shiny and new' edition

Our new website is live!

I am excited to share that Wickens Herzer Panza has officially launched a completely redesigned website.

Our goal was simple: make it faster and easier to find our insights, resources, and people—while showcasing our depth and agility.

Our new site features a clean, modern design, along with refreshed and expanded content:

• Attorney Bios – Experience, focus areas, fun facts, and direct contact details.

• Practice Area & Industry Pages – Plain-language overviews of how we solve problems for businesses like yours.

• News & Alerts – Timely articles, case analyses, and thought leadership geared toward business owners and entrepreneurs.

• Firm Insights – Events, community involvement, and the culture that drives our client service.

Our refreshed branding—Big Firm Ability; Small Firm Agility—features prominently on the new home page. This isn't marketing rhetoric; it's who we are:

• Big Firm Ability – Seasoned lawyers, multi-disciplinary teams, and the bench strength to handle sophisticated transactions, complex litigation, and strategic planning.

• Small Firm Agility – Direct access to decision-makers, responsive service, and customized solutions delivered at the pace a business demands.

Massive shoutout to PaperStreet Web Design for knocking our new website out of the park!

Check out the new WickensLaw.com and let me know what you think. If you've got questions about how we can help you or your business, just grab my contact info right from the site.

---

Here's what I read this week that you should read, too.

🚨 SCOTUS refused to extend Bostock—but it also didn't gut it. That matters, a lot.

Yesterday, in U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court held that states can constitutionally prohibit puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teenagers, rejecting a Equal Protection challenge to the law. It's a dangerous decision. Because of the votes of six Supreme Court justices, many children will suffer and some will even die.

The Court also refused to extend Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that Title VII protects LGBTQ+ employees from workplace discrimination "because of sex."

Yet, there is hope from this opinion. The Court could have used Skrmetti to start walking back Bostock. It didn't. In fact, it went out of its way to distinguish Bostock without undermining its holding.

FIFA gets a red card for its missing anti-discrimination stance

FIFA says it has a zero-tolerance policy against racism and discrimination.

But during this year's inaugural Club World Cup—in the United States of all places—that commitment has gone missing. No "No Racism" signage. No "No Discrimination" videos. No announcements. No armbands. No social media messaging. Just silence. (And a Dance Cam encouraging people to "Be Active.")

Compare that to past FIFA tournaments, where anti-racism and inclusion messages were projected on jumbotrons, splashed across LED boards, and worn on armbands—from "Unite for Gender Equality" to "Unite for Inclusion." Now? Nothing.

FIFA hasn't explained why. But the silence speaks volumes.

When immigration policy change overnight…

What's an employer supposed to do when immigration policy shifts overnight?

That's the question employers across the country are now facing. More than 500,000 immigrant workers—who entered the U.S. legally under a humanitarian parole program—were recently told to leave their jobs and “self-deport” after the Department of Homeland Security abruptly ended the program.

The headlines are emotional. The legal issues are complex.

Generally, if an employee has a properly completed I-9 form, the employer is not liable for hiring someone who later turns out to be unauthorized. As long as the documents provided at the time of hire reasonably appear genuine and relate to the employee, you're in the clear. That's exactly how the system is meant to work.

This situation, however, is different. In this case, the government is notifying employers that certain employees' immigration status has changed—and that they are no longer authorized to remain in the U.S. Still, even under these circumstances, telling an employee to "self-deport" carries legal risk.