Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis has a Coronavirus Response Team. Contact Jon Hyman to help with how your business should
continue to respond to this national emergency.



Don’t forget to cast your vote for the Worst Employer of 2020


Thursday, November 12, 2020

Coronavirus Update 11-12-2020: Breaking down the potential liabilities in Ohio’s new mask rules


During yesterday evening's statewide address, and amid dangerously rising COVID-19 infections and hospitalization, Governor Mike DeWine, announced the reissuing and restating of Ohio's mask mandate. The order now contains four specific rules for businesses to follow regarding mandatory masking.

  1. Each business will be required to post a Face Covering Requirement sign (version 1 / version 2) at all public entrances of the store.

  2. Each business will be responsible for ensuring that customers and employees are wearing masks.

  3. A new Retail Compliance Unit, comprised of agents led by the Bureau of Workers' compensation, will inspect to ensure compliance.

  4. First violations will receive a written warning, and a second will result in a 24-hour closure of the business.

First and foremost, before the disabled and their advocates start screaming that this order violates the ADA, it doesn't. Yes, Title III of the ADA requires that businesses that are open to the public make exceptions to mask rules for those with disabilities that prevent them from wearing a mask. That accommodation, however, need not be letting them inside the business unmasked. You can offer online ordering and curbside pickup. You can have shoppers at the ready to make purchases on-call and bring them outside to the customers, or otherwise meet the customer outside to transact business. As long as your service is made "readily accessible" for someone with a disability, you've met your obligation under the ADA, and there are many ways to accomplish this without letting someone inside maskless.

The same applies to employees. Title I of the ADA allows employers to modify work rules as a reasonable accommodation for an employee's disability. If a mask causes an issue for someone with a disability, the solution is to offer that individual an accommodation. Maybe you segregate the employee so that he or she does not come into contact with anyone else. Maybe you permit that employee to work from home. Maybe you grant a leave of absence until the risk abates. The point is that the employer and the employee have options other than allowing them to work freely without a mask.

Secondly, the combination of numbers two, three, and four have me concerned if an employer is going to place compliance and enforcement responsibility on its employees. 

For reasons that still befuddle and escape me, some people become hostile when told to wear a mask. Yet, your employees are not professionally trained in diffusing hostile situations. Don't leave it up to your untrained employees to try to enforce these rules and potentially deal with escalating hostilities and violence. You wouldn't send an amateur to defuse a bomb, lest you risk an explosion. This situation is no different. (It also might violate OSHA's General Duty Clause.) Instead:

  1. Deploy trained personnel (ideally security, but at least someone at a management level) to enforce this mandatory mask rule and ensure 100 percent compliance within your business; and 

  2. Train all other employees not to engage and instead to summon a designated responder. 

This rule is long overdue. We all agree that masks are the number one thing we must do to slow the spread of COVID-19. Let's mask up and all do our part.