Those were the concluding words in a scribe Bill Ackman, a hedge fund CEO, posted on X in defense of a discrimination lawsuit facing his company.
His post, while deeply personal, is a masterclass in how NOT to handle employment litigation.
Let me be clear. CEOs absolutely have the right to defend their companies against what they believe are meritless claims. Some lawsuits are opportunistic. Some are not. That's what courts are for.
But the moment a CEO decides to litigate that dispute in the court of public opinion, the risk calculus changes—and not in the company's favor.
Start with control. Once you take your story public, you no longer own it. The narrative splinters. Media outlets cherry-pick details. Social media amplifies outrage. And plaintiff's counsel? They sit back and watch you do their work for them.
Because that's the second problem—you're creating evidence. Every assertion, every characterization, every "fact" you post is now part of the record. Opposing counsel will dissect it line by line, looking for inconsistencies, exaggerations, or admissions. What feels like a defense becomes a deposition exhibit and evidence of pretext.
Third, you're inflating the stakes. Most employment cases are business decisions dressed up as legal disputes. They resolve quietly because that's often the rational outcome. But once you go public, you've turned a dispute into a spectacle. Now settlement isn't just about dollars—it's about saving face.
Fourth, you're undercutting your own lawyers. Effective legal strategy requires discipline, precision, and timing. A CEO posting a blow-by-blow account on X is the opposite of all three. You're not helping your case; you're destabilizing it.
And then there's your workforce. Employees aren't reading your post as a principled stand. They're asking a simpler question: if something goes wrong for me, will my employer take it to the internet? That's not a culture-builder.
None of this means CEOs should roll over. They shouldn't. Defend the case. Take it to trial if necessary. Push back against meritless claims.
But do it in the right forum.
Because the court of public opinion has no rules of evidence, no burden of proof, and no off switch. And once you step into it, you may win the argument, and lose everything else.