Photo by N. on Unsplash |
Monitoring of employees has gone even more high tech. The Chicago Tribune reports that Amazon has developed wristbands to track worker hand movements as they fill and ship orders in its warehouses and distribution centers.
Photo by N. on Unsplash |
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” (George Santayana)It’s been eight long years since Bozeman, Montana, set the internet on fire by requiring that job applicants for municipal positions turn over passwords to their personal social media accounts as part of the application process. In the wake of that story, states rushed to introduce legislation prohibiting this practice; many succeeded. And, the story more or less died.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Here’s one you don’t see everyday. According to ESPN, the Los Angeles Lakers are peeved at one of their teammates, rookie D’Angelo Russell. So far, no big deal. That is, no big deal until you understand the cause of the rift. I’ll let ESPN take it from here.
Sources told ESPN.com that some teammates' trust in Russell is eroding after a video surfaced in the past week that shows Russell recording a private conversation between himself and teammate Nick Young. Young does not appear to realize he is being taped. The video, which is believed to have come to light last week via the Twitter account of a celebrity gossip site, shows Russell filming Young while asking questions about Young being with other women.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
At the beginning of 2015, I reported on the launch of a new app — Memo — which allowed employees to post anonymous comments or complaints about their workplaces. Microsoft has now joined the fray of workplace griping apps with one of its own, called Forum.
According to the app’s description, it “lets ideas thrive, facilitates open dialogue within organizations, and enables employees to freely express themselves.” More importantly, unlike Memo, Forum appears to be non-anonymous. From iMore: “Forum has apparently been designed primarily for businesses to give their employees a chance to speak their minds and connect with their fellow workers and executives.”
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
The e-mail…, which appears to be sent from a group titled the “GoDaddy Recruiting Team,” begins with a tame form letter, explaining that Connolly had not been selected for a job as a mobile IOS developer. But the note he said he saw below it in the e-mail chain packed an unusual punch.
It read, “about keith he’s great for the job in skills but he looks worse for wear do we really want an obeese (sic) christian? is that what our new image requires of us.”
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.
Employers, I can see the writing on the wall, and it’s not looking good for your continued reliance on your non-exempt employees using their smartphones off-the-clock.
In the past few days, this issue has picked up a ton of momentum. First, the Wall Street Journal ran an article entitled, “Can You Sue the Boss for Making You Answer Late-Night Email?” Then, the Wage & Hour Litigation Blog reported that the Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division announced a request for information regarding “the use of technology, including portable electronic devices, by employees away from the workplace and outside of scheduled work hours outside of scheduled work outside of scheduled work hours.” Finally, the ABA Journal reminded us that the same Wage & Hour Division will likely raise the salary floor for exemption eligibility from $23,600 a year to $50,000 a year. This significant bump in the salary test will remove a large chunk of your employees from many of the FLSA’s key overtime exemptions.
What does all this mean? It means that you need to take a long, hard, look at which of your employees you are requiring to connect when they are “off-the-clock.” If you are requiring your non-exempt employees to read and respond to emails after their work day “ends,” you need to examine whether the FLSA requires that you pay them for that time (more often than not at a 1.5 overtime premium).
I’m pretty certain that the Department of Labor consider this time compensable, but I’m not so sure. Even if reading and replying to work-related email is compensable “work,” I’m not convinced that employers should have to pay employees for it. Most messages can be read in a matter of seconds or, at most, a few short minutes. The FLSA calls such time de minimus, and does not require compensation for it. “Insubstantial or insignificant periods of time beyond the scheduled working hours, which cannot as a practical administrative matter be precisely recorded for payroll purposes, may be disregarded.” Think of the administrative nightmare if an HR or payroll department has to track, record, and pay for each and every fraction of a minute an employee spends reading an email.
Nevertheless, if you want to eliminate the risk over this issue, I suggest you consider a couple of steps:
This issue is not going away any time soon, and illustrates the difficulty the law has keeping up with the stunning pace of technology.
For more on this important issue, I recommend Just how nervous should companies be about FLSA lawsuits over employee smartphone use? (Hint: very) via Eric Meyer’s Employer Handbook Blog.
Do you like what you read? Receive updates two different ways:
Subscribe to the feed or register for free email updates.